|The Library of Congress > American Memory|
USING THE COLLECTIONS
SELECTED AREAS FOR RESEARCH
LAW LIBRARY EXTERNAL SITES
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is generally perceived as having granted women more freedom in the workplace and a right to expect equal treatment.73 Despite glass ceilings and other impediments, the passage of this act was a major legal victory. It was the cumulation of several struggles that began early in United States history.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 exemplifies how various categories of law interact. As statutory law, the act forbade gender-based discrimination in the employment arena:
The courts broadened the scope of the law when interpreting the statutory language. For instance, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit introduced the concept of “hostile environment” as a criterion to be used to determine whether or not the law has been violated:
As the number of court cases and judicial precedents increased, the body of common law grew and expanded the concept that originated from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In accordance with legislative language and judicial interpretations, various administrative agencies further delineated the statute by implementing affirmative-action programs with guidelines that were applicable only to a specific agency, thus creating a body of regulatory law. An example from the Department of Justice:
When you try to locate law concerning a specific aspect of the Civil Rights Act, it is important to review all of these sources to understand fully the issue.
Often, in order to learn why a law was enacted or how the law is intended to apply, you must also review the legislative history documents promulgated during the consideration of the passage of the law. These include U.S. House of Representatives and Senate bills, congressional committee reports, hearings transcripts, and the Congressional Record of debates.77 Using the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as an example, we can look at the fact that the Congressional Record reports that an amendment adding women to the protected class was offered by Congressman Howard Smith of Virginia during floor debate.78
Although women have worked outside the home since the beginnings of this country, they did not possess the legal right to challenge inequities in the workplace. When women gained legal equality in the workplace, federal statutory law created rights and remedies based on which women could file suit against an employer or potential employer for employment discrimination.
Legal history shows that women have not always possessed this right by either federal or state law, resulting in there being few remedies available to them in court.
Nevertheless many suits have been filed. Often these were dismissed “for lack of a cause of action” because of the grounds on which they were brought. Nineteenth-century women filed suits against discrimination based on the Fourteenth Amendment's privileges and immunities clause and failed to win favorable results. Today, women file suits based on the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause and on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, and win favorable decisions. As a result, a considerable body of precedent has been set in the courts, giving women the rights and remedies they need to enforce equal treatment in employment settings.[Top]
|Home||Table of Contents||About the Guide||Abbreviations||Search|
|The Library of Congress> > American Memory|