<!doctype tei2 public "-//Library of Congress - Historical Collections (American Memory)//DTD ammem.dtd//EN" [<!entity % images system "lg68.ent"> %images;]>
<tei2>
<teiheader type="text" creator="American Memory, Library of Congress" status="new" date.created="1/19/96">
<filedesc>
<titlestmt>
<title>
AMRLG-LG68
</title>
<title>
Cost of living studies.  No. 1, 1928:  Quality and cost estimate of the standard of living of the professional class:  a machine-readable transcription.
</title>
<title>
The Coolidge Era and the Consumer Economy, 1921-1929; American Memory, Library of Congress.
</title>
<resp>
<role>
Selected and converted.
</role>
<name>
American Memory, Library of Congress.
</name>
</resp>
</titlestmt>
<publicationstmt>
<p>
Washington, 1995.
</p>
<p>
Preceding element provides place and date of transcription only.
</p>
<p>
This transcription intended to be 99.95% accurate.
</p>
<p>
For more information about this text and this American Memory collection, refer to accompanying matter.
</p>
</publicationstmt>
<sourcedesc>
<lccn>
unk81-50287
</lccn>
<coll>
General Collection, Library of Congress.
</coll>
<copyright>
Copyright status not determined.
</copyright>
</sourcedesc>
</filedesc>
</teiheader>
<text type="publication">
<front>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680001">001</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div type="idinfo">
<p>
COST OF LIVING STUDIES
<lb>
QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE OF THE STANDARD OF
<lb>
LIVING OF THE PROFESSIONAL CLASS
</p>
<p>
COMPILED UNDER THE
<lb>
HELLER COMMITTEE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL ECONOMICS
<lb>
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
University of California Publications in Economics
</hi>
<lb>
Volume 5, No. 2, pp. 129-160
</p>
<p>
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS
<lb>
BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA
<lb>
1928
</p>
<p>
<stamped>
Sub 
<omit reason="illegible" extent="1 word">
</stamped>
</p>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680002">002</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PUBLICATIONS
</head>
<ad>
<p>
Note.&mdash;The University of California Publications are offered in exchange for the publications of learned societies and instructions, universities and libraries.  Complete lists of all the publications of the University will be sent upon request.  For sample copies, lists of publications and other information, address the manager of the University Press, Berkeley, California, U. S. A.  All matter sent in exchange should be addressed to The Exchange Department, University Library, Berkeley, California, U. S. A.
</p>
</ad></div>
<div>
<head>
ECONOMICS
</head>
<ad><list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>
Ira B. Cross, Stuart Daggett, and Carl C. Plehn, Editors.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vols. I ($5.00), II ($4.00), III ($3.50), and IV ($3.00).  Vol. V in progress.  Cited as Univ. Calif. Publ. Econ.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol. 1
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Gold, Prices, and Wages under the Greenback Standard, by Wesley C. Mitchell.  632 pages, with 12 charts.  March, 1908
<hsep>
$5.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol. 2
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
A History of California Labor Legislation, with an Introductory Sketch of the San Francisco Labor Movement, by Lucile Eaves.  461 pages.  August, 1910
<hsep>
4.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol. 3
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  Women in Trade Unions in San Francisco, by Lillian Ruth Matthews.  Pp. 1-100.  June, 1913
<hsep>
1.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  A Financial History of California, by William C. Fankhauser.  Pp. 101-408.  November, 1913
<hsep>
2.50
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  Jurisdictional Disputes Resulting from Structural Differences in American Trade Unions, by Solomon Blum.  Pp. 409-447.  September, 1913
<hsep>
.35
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Index, pp. 449-451.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol. 4
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  The Launching of the Industrial Workers of the World, by Paul. F. Brissenden.  Pp. 1-82.  November, 1913
<hsep>
.75
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  Life Insurance for Professors, a Study of the Problem of Protection for the Families of Salaried Men, by Charles E. Brooks.  Pp. 83-113.  April, 1916
<hsep>
.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  The Conflict of Tax Laws, by Rowland Estcourt.  Pp. 115-231.  April, 1918
<hsep>
1.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
4.  Collective Bargaining and Trade Agreements in the Brewery, Metal, Teaming and Building Trades of San Francisco, California, by Ira B. Cross.  Pp. 233-364.  May, 1918
<hsep>
.30
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Index, pp. 365-367.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol. 5
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  The Dependent Aged in San Francisco, prepared under the Heller Committee for Research in Social Economics of the University of California in collaboration with the Coordination Committee of the San Francisco Community Chest.  xiv + 127 pp.  February, 1928
<hsep>
1.80
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  Cost of Living Studies.  Quantity and Cost Estimate of the Standard of Living of the Professional Class, compiled under the Heller Committee for Research in Social Economics of the University of California.  Pp. 129-160.  November, 1928
<hsep>
.40
</p>
</item>
</list>
</ad>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680003">003</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<p>
<add place="other">
<handwritten>
HI6994
<lb>
S433
</handwritten>
</add>
</p>
<p>
COST OF LIVING STUDIES
<lb>
QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE OF THE STANDARD
<lb>
OF LIVING OF THE PROFESSIONAL CLASS
</p>
<p>
COMPILED UNDER THE
<lb>
HELLER COMMITTEE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL ECONOMICS
<lb>
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680004">004</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
University of California Publications in Economics
</hi>
<lb>
Volume 5, No. 2, pp. 129-160
<lb>
Issued November 8, 1928
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
University of California Press
<lb>
Berkeley, California
</hi>
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
Cambridge University Press
</hi>
<lb>
London, England
</p>
<p>
<stamped>
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
<lb>
NOV 17, 1923
<lb>
DOCUMENTS DIVISION
</stamped>
</p>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680005">005</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div type="toc">
<head>
CONTENTS
</head>
<list>
<item>
<p>
<hsep>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
Page
</hi>
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Foreword
<hsep>
iii
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Introduction
<hsep>
129
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Economic Background
<hsep>
132
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
The Distribution of Cost
<hsep>
133
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Food
<hsep>
135
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Clothing
<hsep>
137
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Housing
<hsep>
146
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
House Operation
<hsep>
147
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Miscellaneous
<hsep>
151
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Appendix
<hsep>
157
</p>
</item>
</list>
</div>
<div>
<head>
LIST OF TABLES
</head>
<list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>
<hsep>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
Page
</hi>
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  Distribution of total costs, and the per cent of each major division to total cost
<hsep>
133
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  Costs of specified items with per cent of each to total cost
<hsep>
134
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  Amount of the chief categories of foodstuffs used during the month, with the total monthly costs and the annual costs
<hsep>
136
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
4.  Total stock of clothing for the husband with the annual costs of replacement and upkeep
<hsep>
139
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
5.  Total stock of clothing for the wife the annual costs of replacement and upkeep
<hsep>
141
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
6.  Total stock of clothing for boy of eleven with the annual costs of replacement and upkeep
<hsep>
144
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
7.  Total stock of clothing for girl of five with the annual costs of replacement and upkeep
<hsep>
145
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
8.  Annual cost of a house bought on the installment plan
<hsep>
146
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
9.  House operation, details of items with annual costs
<hsep>
148
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
10.  Initial cost of furnishing a house with the annual costs of replacements
<hsep>
150
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
11.  Miscellaneous items with annual costs for each item
<hsep>
151
</p>
</item>
</list>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680006">006</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>
FOREWORD
</head>
<p>
The problem of measuring living costs may be approached in one of two ways&mdash;either by showing the range and change in retail prices, or by prosecuting studies in family expenditures.  Studies of family expenditure are of first importance, since every study in retail prices rests upon some combination of a list of articles based on one of two assumptions, either a theory of the &ldquo;normal&rdquo; or ordinary consumption of a &ldquo;normal&rdquo; family in the wage-earning group or some other income class, or on some theory of family needs scientifically determined.
</p>
<p>
The quantity and cost estimate here following is one of a series of studies in the cost living as measured by expenditures.  It is an experiment in showing the costs of living by means of a hypothetical family in an occupation customarily called professional.  The details of the scale of wants of this hypothetical family have been worked out, not by the account method but by combining the costs, at current prices, of the articles and quantities believed to represent the habitual requirements of a typical American family, occupied in one of the professions, with a standard of living shaped by influences such as custom, conventions, fashion, and, in even greater degree than by any 
<hi rend="italics">
rationale
</hi>
 of spending, the temptations of the shops.
</p>
<p>
The committee desires to emphasize the fact that this quantity and cost estimate is not a theory of ideal expenditure.  It is an attempt to present a theory of customary spending at the professional standard.  The estimate shows what is believed to be the current way of using goods and services in professional families in a given locality and at a given time.  Choice, influenced by personal preferences resulting from special theories of hygiene, sanitation, taste, and the like will, of course, slightly influence the range and emphasis in spending, and will throw costs to one or another division of household expenditure.  This estimate is based upon the relief that, for the major part, the long list of items that enter into a family&apos;s expense account&mdash;questions of habit, of taste, of emulative display, of interest in a bargain and the market&mdash;are the major influences controlling the consumer.  It is the result of these influences that this estimate presents.  One of the notable points, in which the estimate may seem to differ from accepted dogma concerning spending, is in the amount <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680007">007</controlpgno><printpgno>iv</printpgno></pageinfo>set aside for investment.  All model budgets published by savings banks and other teachers of thrift throughout the country include a provision for savings, at the range of income similar to the total arrived at here, would amount to from fifteen to twenty per cent of the total annual expenditure.  The estimate before the reader assigns only ten per cent of the total to savings, and such savings include life insurance premiums.  This allowance for savings is so small that it cannot provide an investment, but serves only as a fund for emergency or for such expense as the purchase of a new car.  If the family is to provide forms of investment and provision for the future other than life insurance and the purchase of a home, it must make further deductions from the other classes of expenditure.  It has been assumed by the committee that during the period of paying for the home, the typical family reduces savings to amounts as low as this, and that when payments on the house are concluded, their equivalent will be diverted to other forms of saving.  The committee admits that this interpretation of methods of saving is open to discussion, but the majority of the committee believes that the custom displayed here is typical in the region under discussion and for the type of family that has been studied.
</p>
<p>
In all its detail the quantity and cost estimate herewith presented is an attempt to present an average.  The detail is given in full recognition of the fact that many minor shifts in expenditure are possible.  It is believed, however, that the quantity and cost estimate that follows shows, in some measure at least, the spending ways of the professional class and the costs of a pattern of spending in the San Francisco Bay District in November, 1927.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
Jessica B. Peixotto,
</hi>
 
<hi rend="italics">
Chairman,
</hi>
<lb>
Heller Committee for Research
<lb>
in Social Economics.
<lb>
<hi rend="smallcaps">
Berkeley, California.
</hi>
</p>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680008">008</controlpgno><printpgno>129</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>
COST OF LIVING STUDIES
<lb>
QUANTITY AND COST ESTIMATE OF THE STANDARD OF
<lb>
LIVING OF THE PROFESSIONAL CLASS
<lb>
COMPILED UNDER THE
<lb>
HELLER COMMITTEE FOR RESEARCH IN SOCIAL ECONOMICS
<lb>
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
<lb>
INTRODUCTION
</head>
<p>
In 1920, a period when the post-war high prices were at the peak, the California State Civil Service Commission wanted an answer to the question, &ldquo;What are satisfactory standards of living for state employees, and what do such standards cost?&rdquo;  At the request of the Commission, a special faculty committee of the University of California
<anchor id="n008-01">
1
</anchor>
 made a cost-of-living survey to answer this problem.  As published,
<anchor id="n008-02">
2
</anchor>
 the answer defined three levels of living&mdash;that of a laborer, that of a clerk, and finally that of a class which, for lack of a better term, was called the executive, a class represented by heads of departments in the service of the State of California.
</p>
<note anchor.ids="n008-01" place="bottom">
1 The personnel of this committee was Solomon Blum, chairman, Jessica B. Peixotto, M. E. Jaffa, and R. G. Sproul, of the University of California, and J. C. Whitman, of the State Civil Service Commission.
</note>
<note anchor.ids="n008-02" place="bottom">
2 California State Civil Service Commission:  Cost of living survey (Sacramento, 1923).
</note>
<p>
In 1923, and each year thereafter, the Heller Committee for Research in Social Economics, a committee of the Department of Economics of the University of California, has made a study similar to the one referred to above.  Up to the winter of 1925-26, the same items and quantities used in the Civil Service Commission&apos;s report were listed, and fitted to prices gathered each year in a dozen or more selected retail stores of San Francisco.  In the course of the years, however, certain changes have become necessary.  The fashions changed.  The committee&apos;s altered opinions concerning habits of expenditure needed reinforcement through new sources of information.
</p>
<p>
The question arose as to how to get this additional knowledge.  The objective was a detailed acquaintance with the spending habits of families living at each of the standards of consumption defined in the <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680009">009</controlpgno><printpgno>130</printpgno></pageinfo>original study.  Groups of housewives at the three levels of living were approached with a request to undertake the task of preparing reliable data.  In the end the committee was successful only with a group of wives of professional men.  This was during the winter of 1925-26.  Some forty members of the Committee on Living Costs of the Oakland Forum, a branch of the National League of Women Voters, consented to help.  To make a lengthy task more promising of success, the housewives were given forms
<anchor id="n009-01">
3
</anchor>
 on which the items that families habitually use were listed in great detail.  Each member of the committee was asked to make a quantity estimate of the goods and services which she considered that women with her own standard of consumption required annually.  Twenty-five of these detailed forms were finally filled out.  An average was made of the quantity of each item mentioned in a majority of the twenty-five books.  A price based upon the prices collected in November, 1925, was affixed to each average quantity in the estimate.  The prices affixed were likewise the arithmetic average of the price quotations obtained.  When these prices were fitted to the average quantities, it appeared that $10,000 a year would be required to meet the items and quantities which the estimate included as typical of the total family expenditures.  In particular the cost of clothing, of social entertainment, and of domestic service ran high.  When the housewives who had participated in the enterprise were told of the total expenditure required to purchase the quantities they had assigned, they were greatly dismayed, and declared that $10,000 was a total in excess of their incomes.  Therefore, they said, the study failed to reflect their actual annual expenditures.
</p>
<note anchor.ids="n009-01" place="bottom">
3 See Appendix for sample pages.
</note>
<p>
The committee agreed that this was doubtless true.  However, the quantities listed with care and thought by these housewives seemed the best available record of the spending objectives of women of this occupational group.  If not the actual annual spending power, the quantity estimate recorded a well defined sense of need for certain quantities of goods and service.  The primary aim of the Heller Committee was to display the items and quantities of a standard of living.  The committee believed this quantity estimate showed the standard of living of these housewives if not their actual plane of living.  The quantity estimate they made was therefore used in 1926 to show the consumption standard of a professional family and the money costs of that standard.  Based as the estimate was upon a <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680010">010</controlpgno><printpgno>131</printpgno></pageinfo>matter-of-fact review by conscientious housewives of the items and quantities of their household demand, even with its recognized limitations, their estimate seemed a nearer approach to reality than anything else available.
</p>
<p>
The estimate herewith published represents certain modifications of the quantity estimate made by the members of the Forum.  Estimates for the professional standard prepared in other years give less attention to the income available in professional classes.  This estimate has reference not only to the standard of living, but to earning power.  For example, the quantity estimate made by the twenty-five housewives gave an expenditure of a thousand dollars a year&mdash;ten per cent of the total annual expenditure&mdash;as necessary for the clothing of the wife of the family.  Very probably such a clothing allotment for a woman represents a desire for dress that fashion shows and other business devices are making the common property of all classes of consumers.  But obviously, if the other desires of a typical household are also to find satisfaction, in part at least, the average woman cannot spend a thousand dollars for clothing each year.  This quantity and cost estimate assumes, therefore, that the wife in a family of the class under consideration does not habitually spend a thousand dollars on her wardrobe.  Rather, it is believed, she oscillates between an amount such as this in one year and a sharp, perhaps repentant, restriction in succeeding years in order that the equally desired items under other headings may be satisfied.  In a class determining degree, other items called for revision.  The methods of apportioning income with custom and opinion accept as appropriate ways of dividing annual expenditure were not respected in the estimate prepared by the twenty-five housewives.  While there is no matter-of-fact ground for an undue deference to these habits of apportionment, in actual practice there is an undoubted tendency to try to maintain such proportions.  Finally, a quantity and cost estimate seemed necessary that would represent better some compromise between a rather high scale of wants on the one hand and the prevailing earning power of the average successful professional man on the other.
</p>
<p>
This quantity and cost estimate represents the committee&apos;s present theory of such a compromise as applied to the professional standard of living in the San Francisco Bay District in November, 1927.
</p>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680011">011</controlpgno><printpgno>132</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>
ECONOMIC BACKGROUND
</head>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Locality&mdash;
</hi>
</p>
<p>
Like every other estimate of the quantity and cost of a given way of living, this quantity and cost budget represents, as has been said, a theory of a prevailing standard of living at a given time and in a given locality.  If applied to other parts of the country, modifications of the standard of living herewith presented must be made.
</p>
<p>
Certain peculiarities of the San Francisco Bay District influence the items and quantities assigned in this estimate:
<lb>
<list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>
1.  An equitable climate reduces the winter fuel bill and the ice bill; makes special summer and winter clothing unnecessary; makes equally unnecessary the family trip away from home during not seasons.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  Conditions in the real estate business make a modern house for rent difficult to find, while, on the other hand, easy terms of purchase put house-ownership within the reach of families with moderate incomes.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  Domestic helpers are scarce, with consequent high rates of pay for full-time service.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
4.  Good roads in every direction, with open winters, make the custom of owning and continually using an automobile so universal that automobiles of some type come to be considered among the necessaries.
</p>
</item>
</list>
</p>
<p>
Items such as these represent some of the local variations which appear in this attempt to display faithfully what the professional class in the San Francisco Bay District considers a satisfactory standard of living.
</p>
<p>
The distinctive features of the standard of living outlined here are as follows:  ownership of a modern house in a &ldquo;good&rdquo; neighborhood; food that is designedly nourishing but which includes certain expenditures due to elaboration of menu and of service; the husband&apos;s lunches taken away from home; some help in the administration of the household, but no full-time resident service; a contribution to the Community Chest more or less fixed because the Community Chest now represents a quasi-tax; an automobile, a vacation, occasional patronage of commercial amusements, some formal hospitality.  The standard adopted excludes the possibility of expensive clothing, membership in exclusive clubs, extensive entertainment, or private schooling for the children.
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680012">012</controlpgno><printpgno>133</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Size of family&mdash;
</hi>
</p>
<p>
The family chosen as representative of the class under consideration consists of a man and wife, nearer forty than thirty, and two children&mdash;a boy of eleven and a girl of five.  This family of four conforms in size to the recognized average or &ldquo;census&rdquo; family.  The ages of the children are those which the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics made customary when the &ldquo;Tentative Quantity and Cost Estimate for a Clerk in Washington&rdquo; was worked out in 1919.  The selection of children of different sexes helps to express the costs of the distinct types of clothing and the added housing costs that children of two sexes entail.  Given children of the ages described, the family may ordinarily be considered complete.  With children at this age, it is possible to consider the early years of married life with their temporary quality past and, on the other hand, the children are not yet at the more expensive age when the costs of their higher education, their more ceremonial dress, and their social entertainments must be met.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
THE DISTRIBUTION OF COST
</head>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
The total costs of the standard&mdash;
</hi>
</p>
<p>
Given the prices current in November, 1927, and the standard of living defined for a professional family by the items and quantities listed in this study, a sum of not less than $6,500 a year seems necessary to pay for the goods and services required as part of that scale
</p>
<table entity="lg680012.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 1
<lb>
Distribution of Total Costs, and the Per Cent of Each Major Division to
<lb>
Total Cost
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Per cent of total cost
</cell>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Food
</cell>
<cell>
$1,043.28
</cell>
<cell>
16.0
</cell>
<cell>
Clothing
</cell>
<cell>
893.44
</cell>
<cell>
13.7
</cell>
<cell>
Man
</cell>
<cell>
$237.31
</cell>
<cell>
3.6
</cell>
<cell>
Wife
</cell>
<cell>
424.83
</cell>
<cell>
6.5
</cell>
<cell>
Children
</cell>
<cell>
231.30
</cell>
<cell>
3.6
</cell>
<cell>
Housing
</cell>
<cell>
1,343.30
</cell>
<cell>
20.7
</cell>
<cell>
House operation
</cell>
<cell>
991.98
</cell>
<cell>
15.3
</cell>
<cell>
Miscellaneous
</cell>
<cell>
2,228.00
</cell>
<cell>
34.3
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$6,500.00
</cell>
<cell>
100.0
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680013">013</controlpgno><printpgno>134</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680013.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 2
<lb>
Costs of Specified Items with Per Cent of Each to Total Cost
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Per cent of total cost
</cell>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Food
</cell>
<cell>
$1,043.28
</cell>
<cell>
16.0
</cell>
<cell>
Clothing
</cell>
<cell>
893.44
</cell>
<cell>
13.7
</cell>
<cell>
Wife
</cell>
<cell>
$424.83
</cell>
<cell>
6.5
</cell>
<cell>
Man
</cell>
<cell>
237.31
</cell>
<cell>
3.6
</cell>
<cell>
Boy of 11
</cell>
<cell>
115.67
</cell>
<cell>
1.8
</cell>
<cell>
Girl of 5
</cell>
<cell>
115.63
</cell>
<cell>
1.8
</cell>
<cell>
Housing
</cell>
<cell>
1,343.30
</cell>
<cell>
20.7
</cell>
<cell>
Installments and interest
</cell>
<cell>
959.40
</cell>
<cell>
14.8
</cell>
<cell>
Taxes
</cell>
<cell>
237.90
</cell>
<cell>
3.7
</cell>
<cell>
Repairs
</cell>
<cell>
80.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.2
</cell>
<cell>
Water
</cell>
<cell>
30.00
</cell>
<cell>
.5
</cell>
<cell>
Garden
</cell>
<cell>
20.00
</cell>
<cell>
.3
</cell>
<cell>
Fire Insurance
</cell>
<cell>
16.00
</cell>
<cell>
.2
</cell>
<cell>
House operation
</cell>
<cell>
991.98
</cell>
<cell>
15.3
</cell>
<cell>
Service
</cell>
<cell>
300.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.6
</cell>
<cell>
Replacements
</cell>
<cell>
250.00
</cell>
<cell>
3.9
</cell>
<cell>
Coal and wood
</cell>
<cell>
95.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.5
</cell>
<cell>
Laundry sent out
</cell>
<cell>
78.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.2
</cell>
<cell>
Gas
</cell>
<cell>
72.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.1
</cell>
<cell>
Telephone
</cell>
<cell>
48.00
</cell>
<cell>
.7
</cell>
<cell>
Electricity
</cell>
<cell>
42.00
</cell>
<cell>
.7
</cell>
<cell>
Personal cleaning supplies
</cell>
<cell>
30.00
</cell>
<cell>
.5
</cell>
<cell>
Ice
</cell>
<cell>
28.00
</cell>
<cell>
.4
</cell>
<cell>
House cleaning supplies
</cell>
<cell>
19.98
</cell>
<cell>
.3
</cell>
<cell>
Stationery and postage
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
.2
</cell>
<cell>
Garbage removal
</cell>
<cell>
9.00
</cell>
<cell>
.1
</cell>
<cell>
Fire insurance on furniture
</cell>
<cell>
8.00
</cell>
<cell>
.1
</cell>
<cell>
Miscellaneous
</cell>
<cell>
2,228.00
</cell>
<cell>
34.3
</cell>
<cell>
Savings and life insurance
</cell>
<cell>
620.00
</cell>
<cell>
9.6
</cell>
<cell>
Automobile
</cell>
<cell>
382.48
</cell>
<cell>
5.9
</cell>
<cell>
Medical care
</cell>
<cell>
275.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.2
</cell>
<cell>
Recreation
</cell>
<cell>
219.40
</cell>
<cell>
3.4
</cell>
<cell>
Education
</cell>
<cell>
136.80
</cell>
<cell>
2.1
</cell>
<cell>
Gifts
</cell>
<cell>
125.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.9
</cell>
<cell>
Social entertainment
</cell>
<cell>
123.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.9
</cell>
<cell>
Charity
</cell>
<cell>
60.00
</cell>
<cell>
.9
</cell>
<cell>
Incidentals
</cell>
<cell>
60.00
</cell>
<cell>
.9
</cell>
<cell>
Tobacco
</cell>
<cell>
54.00
</cell>
<cell>
.8
</cell>
<cell>
Church
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
.8
</cell>
<cell>
Barber and cosmetics
</cell>
<cell>
46.32
</cell>
<cell>
.7
</cell>
<cell>
Carfare
</cell>
<cell>
40.00
</cell>
<cell>
.6
</cell>
<cell>
Organization dues
</cell>
<cell>
36.00
</cell>
<cell>
.6
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$6,500.00
</cell>
<cell>
100.0
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680014">014</controlpgno><printpgno>135</printpgno></pageinfo><p>of wants that most professional people consider at once necessary and conservative.  Whether or no the majority of young men in the professions may expect to earn such an income regularly is not here the question.  If this estimate is, as it is believed to be, index of fact, no smaller sum will meet the current and controlling theory of a conservative list of needs for the class in question.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
General distribution of costs
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Tables 1 and 2 show the largest single division of needs and costs under the heading &ldquo;miscellaneous.&rdquo;  Given the standard of living, this allotment conforms to traditions and current practice.  The fourteen item in this division, including such important absorbers of income as investment and savings, recreation, medical care, and the automobile, require expenditures taking one-third of the total expenditure.  The housing costs take 21 per cent.  Given the food estimate used, food costs absorb 16 per cent of the total expenditure.  The division of household needs most often treated slightingly, house operation with its fourteen items, absorbs 15 per cent.  The clothing estimate takes 14 per cent of the total, the least proportion of the total income.  The fact cannot be too often emphasized that the allotments appearing in these summary tables, like all the quantities and costs assigned throughout this study, are presented with no reference to any theory of exemplary spending nor any considerations of biological needs.  The committee has set them down because it believes that these lists characterize, in a general way at least, the spending habits of the class of consumers here under consideration.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
FOOD
</head>
<p>
In the estimate that the California State Civil Service Commission published in 1921-22, Dr. Meyer E. Jaffa, of the University of California, prepared the food items and quantities.  It was Dr. Jaffa&apos;s theory that the kinds and amount of foodstuffs appearing in the allotment for the executive
<anchor id="n014-01">
4
</anchor>
 met all requirements for energy and vigor, and allowed, in addition, certain expenditures for variety to tempt the appetite.  This estimate for feeding the family of an executive, slightly revised and fitted to the prices of 1927, has been used in making the statement of requirement that appears in table 3.  The consumption of starches and fats may possibly in actual custom be</p>
<note anchor.ids="n014-01" place="bottom">
4 California State Civil Service Commission:  Cost of living survey (Sacramento, 1923), table 43, p. 61.
</note>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680015">015</controlpgno><printpgno>136</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680015.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 3
<lb>
Amount of the Chief Categories of Foodstuffs used during one month
<lb>
with the Total Monthly Costs and The Annual Costs
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Pounds per month
</cell>
<cell>
Price per pound
</cell>
<cell>
Total cost
</cell>
<cell>
1.  Meals at home:
</cell>
<cell>
Class I:
</cell>
<cell>
Meat and fish
</cell>
<cell>
52
</cell>
<cell>
.371
</cell>
<cell>
$19.29
</cell>
<cell>
Milk
</cell>
<cell>
120
</cell>
<cell>
.065
</cell>
<cell>
7.80
</cell>
<cell>
Eggs
</cell>
<cell>
12
</cell>
<cell>
.394
</cell>
<cell>
4.73
</cell>
<cell>
Class II:
</cell>
<cell>
Flour and bread
</cell>
<cell>
43
</cell>
<cell>
.095
</cell>
<cell>
4.08
</cell>
<cell>
Other cereals
</cell>
<cell>
22
</cell>
<cell>
.119
</cell>
<cell>
2.62
</cell>
<cell>
Class III:
</cell>
<cell>
Vegetables
</cell>
<cell>
115
</cell>
<cell>
.055
</cell>
<cell>
6.32
</cell>
<cell>
Fruit
</cell>
<cell>
64
</cell>
<cell>
.097
</cell>
<cell>
6.21
</cell>
<cell>
Class IV:
</cell>
<cell>
Butter
</cell>
<cell>
10
</cell>
<cell>
.065
</cell>
<cell>
6.05
</cell>
<cell>
Other oils and fats
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
.250
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
Class V:
</cell>
<cell>
Sugar
</cell>
<cell>
24
</cell>
<cell>
.073
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Class VI:
</cell>
<cell>
Coffee, tea
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.624
</cell>
<cell>
3.74
</cell>
<cell>
Sundries
</cell>
<cell>
9.85
</cell>
<cell>
Total cost per month
</cell>
<cell>
$74.44
</cell>
<cell>
Total per year for meals at home
</cell>
<cell>
$893.28
</cell>
<cell>
2.  Meals away from home:
</cell>
<cell>
Husband&apos;s lunches&mdash;6 days a week, 50 weeks, @$.50
</cell>
<cell>
Total food per year
</cell>
<cell>
$1,043.28
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<p>lower than the distribution shown in table 3.  Recent dietetic teachings and the influence of the fruit and vegetable market in California are undoubtedly developing habits that dictate an alternative increase in the quantities of fruits and vegetables used.  In this family group the average number of persons fed at home per diem has been assumed to be 3.78.  This number was fixed upon by counting the husband absent daily from luncheon, Sundays excepted, and calculating that some help or a guest would be present at a meal at least twice a week.  The average cost of food per capita per diem is therefore sixty-five cents.
<anchor id="n015-01">
5
</anchor>
</p>
<note anchor.ids="n015-01" place="bottom">
5 This per diem cost of sixty-five cents, reached by the quantity and cost method, checks interestingly with a similar per diem cost recently acquired by the account book method in an unpublished intensive study of food consumption among twelve professional families made during the past year by the Heller Committee.
</note>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680016">016</controlpgno><printpgno>137</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Meals away from home
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
The allotment for meals taken away from home allows for the husband&apos;s luncheons on business days.  If the other members of the family use public eating places, such meals must be paid for out of other funds than the food allowance appearing in table 3.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
CLOTHING
</head>
<p>
Undoubtedly the most fluctuating and uncertain element of expenditure today is the clothing standard.  It is particularly in the costs of clothing that the majority of the community feel the burden of the inflated standards set by the luxury spenders.  Americans notoriously wear a standardized dress, but the tendency is to level up.  The man with $2,000 a year and the man with $20,000 aim to appear equally well dressed, and this ambition applies to his family as well as to himself.  In tis country, too, shabbiness means not only personal discomfort but, in theory at least, a professional handicap.  The desire to have one&apos;s wife and family well dressed, the love of fashionable and fresh clothing, and the lure of the clothing market all play heavily upon good intentions about economic management and income possibilities.
</p>
<p>
The expenditure for clothing displayed in tables 4, 5, 6, and 7 assume a family with the clothing standard of the professional class, resolved to keep up appearances in clothing, and at the same time to keep the costs as moderate as possible.  This clothing standard includes a desire for warmth, comfort, and decency, special types of garments for special occasions, and a general intention to have a wardrobe that expresses in some degree fashion, variety, and freshness.  The purchasing standard must also include the resolve to do conscientious buying and conserve garments carefully.  The clothes bought must be of good quality and must be worn as long as a respect for convention permits.  The committee adopts this bias of standard as typical without pausing to pass upon its economic or social merits or demerits.  The wardrobes selected under the influence of this standard cannot be called either elegant or extensive.  The prices quoted are the median in a series given by the shops as the range of prices that might be paid for each item of clothing.  Indeed, occasionally the prices given in the tables are close to the minimum for which goods of the type appearing in the tables may be purchased.
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680017">017</controlpgno><printpgno>138</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
The stock of clothing assigned to the whole family and the prices selected makes the annual expenditure $893.44, or 14 per cent of the annual total.  The wife&apos;s wardrobe takes $424.83, nearly half of the family&apos;s total expenditure for clothing, and 6.5 per cent of the total annual expenditure.  The husband needs $237.31, about one-fourth of the clothing allotment and 3.6 per cent of the total annual expenditure.  The children&apos;s clothing allotment takes the other fourth in about equal parts.  The boy&apos;s made cost $115.67 and the girl&apos;s $115.63.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Husband&apos;s clothing
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
In table 4 the husband&apos;s clothing needs appear in detail.  The quantities represent, it is believed, current practice in the district under inspection.  The period of fifteen years assigned for the man&apos;s dress-suit may, at first thought, seem long.  The committee believes, however, that this length of time expresses a modal habit of replacement for men of this age and class.  The same is true for the overcoat replacement.  Likewise, two new hats a year, either felt or straw, and one good business suit ready-made of the best grade or custom-made by some inexpensive tailor, seem the customary number of these classes of garments that men of this occupational group buy during a year.  The allowance for sport clothes is undoubtedly small.  The quantity assigned would be adequate only for an annual two weeks vacation.  If the man plays golf regularly or goes shooting, fishing, or camping frequently, and during these outdoor sports pays attention to appearances, he must add to his wardrobe; but in order to do it, he must economize in some other item.  Certain garments and clothing accessories are in a border class; for example, sport clothes, slippers, billfolds, and the like&mdash;a class likely to come into the possession of the average person by means of Christmas gifts.  The probabilities are that in many families these items are paid out of the fund assigned in &ldquo;miscellaneous&rdquo; for Christmas gifts.  In order to maintain the replacement standard expressed by the figures in table 4, the clothing must have been purchased with attention to quality, so that a stock of garments not quite ready to discard can be reckoned on to keep the clothing replacement down to the figures given.  The allowance for upkeep of clothes represents the probable minimum annual cost if clothing is to be kept fresh and the individual is not to be clean and press them himself.
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680018">018</controlpgno><printpgno>139</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680018.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 4
<lb>
Total Stock of Clothing for the Husband with the Annual Costs of
<lb>
Replacement and Upkeep
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Unit
</cell>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Stock
</cell>
<cell>
Replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Price
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Formal:
</cell>
<cell>
Full dress suit
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/15
</cell>
<cell>
$75.00
</cell>
<cell>
$5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Tuxedo
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/15
</cell>
<cell>
55.00
</cell>
<cell>
3.67
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
3.33
</cell>
<cell>
Socks-silk
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Shirts:
</cell>
<cell>
Pleated bosom
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Stiff bosom
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Collars
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
.17
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Ties:
</cell>
<cell>
Black bow
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
White bow
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
Muffler
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&frac14;
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.13
</cell>
<cell>
Vests:
</cell>
<cell>
White
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2/15
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.33
</cell>
<cell>
Black
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/5
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
$23.46
</cell>
<cell>
Business clothing:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats:
</cell>
<cell>
Felt
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Straw
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
Overcoat
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
16.67
</cell>
<cell>
Suits
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
65.00
</cell>
<cell>
65.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
8.50
</cell>
<cell>
17.00
</cell>
<cell>
Socks:
</cell>
<cell>
Lisle
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Wool&mdash;mixed
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Shirts:
</cell>
<cell>
Neckband
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Negligee
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Collars:
</cell>
<cell>
Soft
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.33
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
Starched
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.17
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Ties&mdash;four-in-hand
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Handkerchiefs
</cell>
<cell>
18
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
Suspenders
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Belts
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
Garters
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Gloves
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear&mdash;athletic unions
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
Umbrella
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.17
</cell>
<cell>
Bill fold
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.67
</cell>
<cell>
164.26
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680019">019</controlpgno><printpgno>140</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
Sport wear:
</cell>
<cell>
Cap
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
.83
</cell>
<cell>
Sweater
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
6.50
</cell>
<cell>
2.17
</cell>
<cell>
Extra trousers:
</cell>
<cell>
Knickers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
8.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.67
</cell>
<cell>
Khaki
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
2.75
</cell>
<cell>
.92
</cell>
<cell>
Boots
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
3.33
</cell>
<cell>
Golf socks
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
13.42
</cell>
<cell>
House wear:
</cell>
<cell>
Bathrobe
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/6
</cell>
<cell>
8.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.42
</cell>
<cell>
Pajamas
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
House slippers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
7.42
</cell>
<cell>
Total clothing
</cell>
<cell>
$208.56
</cell>
<cell>
Upkeep:
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning suits
</cell>
<cell>
12
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
18.00
</cell>
<cell>
Pressing suits
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
6.75
</cell>
<cell>
Blocking hats
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Half-soles and heels
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
28.75
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$237.31
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Wife&apos;s clothing&mdash;
</hi>
</p>
<p>
The total cost of the annual replacement for the wife&apos;s wardrobe is large if compared with published clothing estimates or records given for the women in families living at the lower income levels.  However, viewed in relation to those possibilities which the professional temptation of the shops now offers women who buy clothing, $424.83 a year buys only what, in relation to the standard of dress controlling the buying of women in the class of consumers here under consideration, is a modest clothing replacement.  Such a woman needs half as much again as the man because the garments she must wear are of perishable material and of a style that shifts more frequently than that of the man.  Also, especially with regard to evening dress, the habit of suiting clothing to occasion holds more firmly for the woman than for the man, and evening dress in particular is the most definitely perishable and expensive part of a woman&apos;s wardrobe.  One dinner dress every other year, one formal evening dress in alternate years requires self-control on the part of the buyer.  If more clothing of this class is wanted in a given year, the alternative, if the clothing </p><pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680020">020</controlpgno><printpgno>141</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680020.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 5
<lb>
Total Stock of Clothing for the Wife with the Annual Costs of
<lb>
Replacement and Upkeep.
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Stock
</cell>
<cell>
Replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Unit price
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Formal:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
$15.00
</cell>
<cell>
$7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Coats
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
85.00
</cell>
<cell>
42.50
</cell>
<cell>
Dresses:
</cell>
<cell>
Dinner
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
25.00
</cell>
<cell>
Afternoon
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
39.50
</cell>
<cell>
39.50
</cell>
<cell>
Evening&mdash;formal
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
25.00
</cell>
<cell>
Slippers
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
11.00
</cell>
<cell>
22.00
</cell>
<cell>
Stockings
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
7.80
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear:
</cell>
<cell>
Costume slips&mdash;silk
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
Brassieres
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
Handkerchiefs
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Gloves&mdash;kid
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
Bags
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
$188.75
</cell>
<cell>
Street wear:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1&half;
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
15.00
</cell>
<cell>
<anchor id="n020-01">
*
</anchor>
Coats
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
25.00
</cell>
<cell>
Furs
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/6
</cell>
<cell>
59.00
</cell>
<cell>
9.83
</cell>
<cell>
Dresses
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
29.50
</cell>
<cell>
29.50
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
8.50
</cell>
<cell>
17.00
</cell>
<cell>
Rubber&mdash;toe
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Stocking
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
11.70
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear:
</cell>
<cell>
Costume slips
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
Corset or equivalent
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Vests:
</cell>
<cell>
Glove silk
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1&half;
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.75
</cell>
<cell>
Rayon
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1&half;
</cell>
<cell>
.95
</cell>
<cell>
1.43
</cell>
<cell>
Bloomers:
</cell>
<cell>
Glove silk
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.95
</cell>
<cell>
5.90
</cell>
<cell>
Rayon
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
3.90
</cell>
<cell>
Brassieres
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Sanitary apron
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Gloves&mdash;fabric
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
Handkerchiefs
</cell>
<cell>
12
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Purse
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Umbrella&mdash;silk
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.67
</cell>
<cell>
154.13
</cell>
<cell>
Sport or country wear:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Sweaters
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
Frocks
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1&half;
</cell>
<cell>
15.00
</cell>
<cell>
22.50
</cell>
<cell>
Oxfords
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
8.50
</cell>
<cell>
8.50
</cell>
<cell>
Scarf
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
43.50
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680021">021</controlpgno><printpgno>142</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
House wear:
</cell>
<cell>
Work dresses
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
$1.95
</cell>
<cell>
$3.90
</cell>
<cell>
Aprons&mdash;cotton
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Bathrobe&mdash;wool or corduroy
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&frac14;
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
1.49
</cell>
<cell>
Kimono&mdash;silk
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/5
</cell>
<cell>
10.95
</cell>
<cell>
2.19
</cell>
<cell>
Bedroom slippers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
.97
</cell>
<cell>
Nightgowns
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
3.90
</cell>
<cell>
13.95
</cell>
<cell>
Incidentals
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Total clothing
</cell>
<cell>
$412.33
</cell>
<cell>
Upkeep:
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
10.50
</cell>
<cell>
Half-soles and heels
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
New heels
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.25
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
12.50
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$424.83
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<note anchor.ids="n020-01" place="bottom">
* Includes sport coats.
</note>
<p>expenditure is to remain below $450 annually, is cheeper dresses, evidently a sacrifice in quality, material, and workmanship which would jeopardize the accuracy of the replacement column.  From all that the committee could gather, one afternoon dress per annum pictures the actual custom.  This is also true for the allotment of one new coat each year.  This estimate permit no evening wrap. To keep within the amount assigned for coats, one coat that conforms to current notions about afternoon and evening wear may be purchased in a given year.  In an alternate year, it is assumed a tailored street coat or a sport coat is purchased.  Thus, each coat in this estimate will be actually used about three or four years.  The estimate for underwear is obviously conservative.  To allow, as this budget does, no special grade of garment for evening wear other than a costume slip and a brassiere to match the evening dress means, for most women, definite abandonment of habits acquired in girlhood.  The quota allowed for spot clothes will, of course, vary from this assignment of two cheap sport frocks annually or one of better quality.  A woman of this spending class may prefer to wear sport clothes.  But, in order to do this, she must, of course, divert certain money, either from her street and afternoon wardrobe, or from other division of family expenditure.  The estimate for upkeep of clothing can only be justified by the assumption that keeping clothing in order is done in major part at home.  The annual hoe bill is $51. Careful consideration <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680022">022</controlpgno><printpgno>143</printpgno></pageinfo>of current habits concerning women&apos;s footwear leads the committee to believe that, year in and out, $51 is a conservative estimate of the present costs of shoes for women who aim to be ordinarily well dressed.  With even more emphasis the same consideration control the quantities and costs of stockings.  The perishable silk stocking fashion makes it seems likely that the average woman will perforce go beyond this conservative allotment of $19.50.  Considered item by item, a woman&apos;s wardrobe that costs $24.83 to replenish annually is an outfit purchaseable at this price only by the most careful buying.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Boy&rsquo; clothing&mdash;
</hi>
</p>
<p>
A small boy of the class in question tends, it has been assumed, to dress with simplicity.  The child is expected to be in a public school; he will wear &ldquo;cords&rdquo; and a sweater.  The family theory regarding renewal of his clothing permits school clothing to be discarded only when it is in reality nearly worn out.  Also it has been considered probable that the boy will go bareheaded much of the time.  In all probability, a healthy and growing boy need at least two suits of good material during three years.  The more ceremonial suit and overcoat assigned for Sunday and other &ldquo;occasions&rdquo; will possibly be outgrown rather than worn out during the years of use allotted.  Although the cost of shoes amounts to $35.50 per annum, this allotment is probably conservative, requiring the assumption that the oxfords purchased for formal occasions will probably be included in school wear after an uncertain period of formal appearance.  Also it may be assumed that each pair of leather shoes will be half-soled once at least.  A pair of overalls or an extra pair of corduroys usually supplement school clothes for Saturday and vacation wear.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Girl&apos;s Clothing
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
For other members of the family than the five-year-old girl, the clothing ha been assumed to be ready-made.  Custom tends to lead most women to abandon the habit of making garments for themselves.  This for several reason; the home dressmaker becomes more expensive and more difficult to find; the disappearance of domestic help makes household administration likely to occupy all the time a woman of this class is willing to give to household affairs; the easy accessibility of ready-made clothing tempts most women not to undertake a task for which many have no native aptitude.  For the small daughter, however, dresses may be supposed to be home-made more often than </p><pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680023">023</controlpgno><printpgno>144</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680023.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 6
<lb>
Total Stock of Clothing for Boy of Eleven with the Annual Costs of
<lb>
Replacement and Upkeep
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Stock
</cell>
<cell>
Replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Unit price
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Dress clothes:
</cell>
<cell>
Cap
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
$ 2.50
</cell>
<cell>
$ 2.50
</cell>
<cell>
Overcoat
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
20.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Suit
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
20.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shirts
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
Ties
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes&mdash;low
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Socks&mdash;three-quarter, wool
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
$ 44.50
</cell>
<cell>
School:
</cell>
<cell>
Rubber rain hat
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Raincoat
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
Sweater
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Cords
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shirts
</cell>
<cell>
5
</cell>
<cell>
5
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Ties
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear&mdash;athletic unions
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes:
</cell>
<cell>
School
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Tennis
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.25
</cell>
<cell>
4.50
</cell>
<cell>
Rubbers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
Socks
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
.33
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Handkerchiefs
</cell>
<cell>
9
</cell>
<cell>
12
</cell>
<cell>
.25
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Garters
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
.25
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
Belts
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
51.00
</cell>
<cell>
Play&mdash;overalls
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Nightclothes:
</cell>
<cell>
Bathrobe
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1/3
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.67
</cell>
<cell>
Bedroom slippers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Pajamas
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
7.42
</cell>
<cell>
Total clothing
</cell>
<cell>
$105.92
</cell>
<cell>
Upkeep:
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
3.75
</cell>
<cell>
Half-soles and heels
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
9.75
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$115.67
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<p>not.  Style for little girls are very simple, so that relatively little time will have to be expended in making the garments he needs.  Better material can be put into the clothes, thus increasing their durability.  The coast, winter or summer, for this child will probably not be home-made, and a given coat, it is assumed, will be made to last two years.  A winter hat every two years and a summer hat <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680024">024</controlpgno><printpgno>145</printpgno></pageinfo>annually seem to express the general conservative custom.  One party frock a year has been considered the least quantity that satisfies on the one hand the child&apos;s craving for things &ldquo;as pretty as other children&apos;s,&rdquo; and on the other hand the mother&apos;s pleasure in dressing</p>
<table entity="lg680024.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 7
<lb>
Total Stock of Clothing for Girl of Five with the Annual Costs of
<lb>
Replacement and Upkeep
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Stock
</cell>
<cell>
Replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Unit price
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Dress clothes:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats:
</cell>
<cell>
Winter
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
$5.95
</cell>
<cell>
$2,98
</cell>
<cell>
Summer
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
3.95
</cell>
<cell>
3.95
</cell>
<cell>
Coats:
</cell>
<cell>
Summer-reefer
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
8.95
</cell>
<cell>
4.48
</cell>
<cell>
Winter
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
15.00
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Party frocks&mdash;made at home
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
7.50
</cell>
<cell>
Dresses&mdash;made at home
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes&mdash;party slippers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Socks&mdash;silk
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
2.25
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear:
</cell>
<cell>
Drawers
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
Slips&mdash;made at home
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
$50.66
</cell>
<cell>
Kindergarten:
</cell>
<cell>
Sweaters
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
3.95
</cell>
<cell>
7.90
</cell>
<cell>
Raincoat with hat
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
5.95
</cell>
<cell>
2.97
</cell>
<cell>
Rubbers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
.85
</cell>
<cell>
.85
</cell>
<cell>
Dresses&mdash;made at home
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
16.00
</cell>
<cell>
Socks
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
4.00
</cell>
<cell>
Underwear
</cell>
<cell>
Unions
</cell>
<cell>
5
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Waists
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Bloomers&mdash;made at home
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
6
</cell>
<cell>
.65
</cell>
<cell>
3.90
</cell>
<cell>
Garters
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
.15
</cell>
<cell>
.60
</cell>
<cell>
Handkerchiefs
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
12
</cell>
<cell>
.15
</cell>
<cell>
1.80
</cell>
<cell>
56.52
</cell>
<cell>
Nightclothes:
</cell>
<cell>
Nightgowns
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
3
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
3.75
</cell>
<cell>
Bathrobe
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
&half;
</cell>
<cell>
3.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Slippers
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
1.25
</cell>
<cell>
6.75
</cell>
<cell>
Total clothing
</cell>
<cell>
$113.93
</cell>
<cell>
Upkeep
</cell>
<cell>
Half-soles and heels
</cell>
<cell>
2
</cell>
<cell>
.85
</cell>
<cell>
1.70
</cell>
<cell>
1.70
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$115.63
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680025">025</controlpgno><printpgno>146</printpgno></pageinfo><p>the little girl.  For this girl, as for the boy, custom, dictates simple and inexpensive school clothes.  In the district under consideration, the climate makes wool or flannel dresses unusual.  Replacement of the lighter weight dresses at a half-dozen a year proved to be the quantity reported as habitually required.  The cost of shoes for a girl of five is set at $29.80.  This estimate permits four pairs of school shoes a year, a pair of slippers every six months.  Since children at the age of five are apt to outgrow shoes before they wear them out, the charge for half-soling is expected to be slight.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
HOUSING
</head>
<table entity="lg680025.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 8
<lb>
Annual Cost of a House Bought on the Installment Plan
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Annual Cost
</cell>
<cell>
Installments and interest (over a 10-year period):
</cell>
<cell>
Value of house $10,000.00&mdash;value of lot $3,000.00
</cell>
<cell>
Original mortgage 65 per cent of value of house, or $6,500.00
</cell>
<cell>
Monthly payments $12.30 per $1,000.00, or $79.95.
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
$959.40
</cell>
<cell>
Taxes:
</cell>
<cell>
Assessed valuation&mdash;50 per cent of total value, or $6,500.00.
</cell>
<cell>
Rates&mdash;$3.66 per $100.00 assessed valuation.
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
237.90
</cell>
<cell>
Repairs
</cell>
<cell>
80.00
</cell>
<cell>
Water&mdash;$2.50 per month
</cell>
<cell>
30.00
</cell>
<cell>
Fire insurance&mdash;$8,000.00 @ $6.00 per $1,000.00 for 3 years
</cell>
<cell>
16.00
</cell>
<cell>
Garden
<anchor id="n025-01">
*
</anchor>
&mdash;plants, seed, fertilizer, etc.
</cell>
<cell>
20.00
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$1,343.30
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<note anchor.ids="n025-01" place="bottom">
* Gardener charged to service (table 9).
</note>
<p>
The figures and facts which appear in table 8 assume that professional families are house owners.  This assumption that ownership of a house is usual, is warranted both by local conditions and by prevailing ideals in relation to shelter.  In the locality under consideration, few houses of the type this class of consumers want are to be rented, and on the other hand, the real estate agencies offer opportunities to purchase on easy terms.  Ownership, therefore, becomes the most expedient thing.  In addition to expediency, the desire for the prestige and pleasure of property right in a dwelling place, and the belief that owning a house is a safe form of investment, tend to clinch <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680026">026</controlpgno><printpgno>147</printpgno></pageinfo>the decision to live in a house of one&apos;s own.  The type of house whose costs appear in table 8 would be, in the neighborhood under consideration, a detached residence with three bedrooms, one or two bathrooms, and with living and dining quarters as separate rooms.  This rather standardized house is assumed to be in a neighborhood called &ldquo;good&rdquo; and near an accredited school.  Given the current prices of real estate in the locality described, a house of this class will cost $10,000 at least; the lot will mean an additional expenditure of $3,000 and up.  Both custom and probable income warrant the further assumption that the house is being paid for on the installment plan.  The plan of buying the dwelling shown here incorporates the scheme generally advocated by the local building and loan societies.  The family has been assumed to be able to pay out of some source other than income, $6,500, an amount that covers the cost of the lot plus 35 per cent of the cost of the building.  A mortgage of $6,500 remains to be paid off over a ten-year period at the rate of $12.30 per thousand per month.  On the basis of this assumption, the installment and interest on principal costs $959.40 per annum, or 15 per cent of the total annual family expenditure.  When taxes, fire insurance, costs of repair, garden, and water charges are added to this sum, the total costs of housing becomes $1343.30 per annum, a somewhat intrusive amount.  Buying a house on such a plan represents a rental exceeding $1200 a year.  When the interest on the $6500 tied up in the house is also computed and added, as it ought to be, to the costs of shelter already enumerated, ownership of this type of house means a cost close to $1700 per annum for the ten-year period while installments are being paid.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
HOUSE OPERATION
</head>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Service and laundry
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
No full-time help is allowed in this estimate.  This decision is based upon the facts that resident help is scarce and the wages for the &ldquo;domestics&rdquo; available are very high.  These circumstances tend to make the wife of even a professional man undertake the major part of her own housework, lightening her routine by using labor-saving devices and part-time assistance for the heavier cleaning, and the laundering.  As part-time assistance, the costs of a cleaning woman or a houseboy one day a week and three extra days of service per annum for thorough cleaning, window washing, and the like </p><pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680027">027</controlpgno><printpgno>148</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680027.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 9
<lb>
House Operation, Details of Items with Annual Costs
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Service
</cell>
<cell>
$300.00
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning and laundry&mdash;1 day a week, 50 weeks, @ $4.00
</cell>
<cell>
$200.00
</cell>
<cell>
Extra cleaning, window washing, etc., 3 days a year, @ $5.00
</cell>
<cell>
15.00
</cell>
<cell>
Gardener&mdash;2 days a year, @ $5.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Care of children&mdash;1 evening a week, 50 weeks, @ $1.50
</cell>
<cell>
75.00
</cell>
<cell>
Laundry sent out @ $1.50 per week
</cell>
<cell>
78.00
</cell>
<cell>
Replacements of furniture and furnishings (see detailed analysis)
</cell>
<cell>
250.00
</cell>
<cell>
Fire insurance on furniture&mdash;$4,000.00 @ $6.00 for 3 years
</cell>
<cell>
8.00
</cell>
<cell>
Light, heat, and fuel
</cell>
<cell>
209.00
</cell>
<cell>
Electricity&mdash;54 k.w.h. per month&mdash;lighting
</cell>
<cell>
42.00
</cell>
<cell>
Gas&mdash;6,300 cu. ft. per month&mdash;cooking
</cell>
<cell>
72.00
</cell>
<cell>
Other fuel&mdash;heating
</cell>
<cell>
95.00
</cell>
<cell>
Kindling blocks&mdash;12 sacks @ 3 for $1.25
</cell>
<cell>
$ 5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Logs for fireplace&mdash;1&half; cords @ @24.00
</cell>
<cell>
36.00
</cell>
<cell>
Coal&mdash;3 tons @ $18.00
</cell>
<cell>
54.00
</cell>
<cell>
Ice&mdash;350 lbs. a month for 8 months @ $.01 per lb
</cell>
<cell>
28.00
</cell>
<cell>
Telephone:
</cell>
<cell>
48.00
</cell>
<cell>
Single party line @ $3.50 per month
</cell>
<cell>
42.00
</cell>
<cell>
Tolls and telegrams @ $.50 per month
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
Garbage removal @ $.75 a month
</cell>
<cell>
9.00
</cell>
<cell>
House cleaning supplies:
</cell>
<cell>
19.98
</cell>
<cell>
Laundry soap&mdash;104 bars @ .04&half;
</cell>
<cell>
4.68
</cell>
<cell>
Washing powder&mdash;12 boxes @ .35
</cell>
<cell>
4.20
</cell>
<cell>
Ammonia&mdash;3 1&half;-pt. bottles @ .25
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
Cleansers&mdash;24 cans @ .07&half;
</cell>
<cell>
1.80
</cell>
<cell>
Soap flakes&mdash;12 large boxes @ .25
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Furniture polish&mdash;1 qt. @ .60
</cell>
<cell>
.60
</cell>
<cell>
Silver polish&mdash;2 boxes @ .25
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Floor wax&mdash;3 lbs. @ .65
</cell>
<cell>
1.95
</cell>
<cell>
Disinfectant&mdash;6 cans @ .25
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Miscellaneous supplies
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Personal cleaning supplies
</cell>
<cell>
30.00
</cell>
<cell>
Soap&mdash;15 cakes per person @ 3 for .25
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Toothbrushes&mdash;3 per person @ .50
</cell>
<cell>
6.00
</cell>
<cell>
Toothpaste&mdash;4 per person @ .35
</cell>
<cell>
5.60
</cell>
<cell>
Mouthwash&mdash;3 bottles @ .55
</cell>
<cell>
1.65
</cell>
<cell>
Combs
</cell>
<cell>
1.75
</cell>
<cell>
Man &half; @ .50
</cell>
<cell>
.25
</cell>
<cell>
Woman &half; @ 1.00
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Children 2 @ .50
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680028">028</controlpgno><printpgno>149</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
Brushes
</cell>
<cell>
2.25
</cell>
<cell>
Man &frac14; @ 2.00
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Woman &frac14; @ 3.00
</cell>
<cell>
.75
</cell>
<cell>
Children &half; @ 2.00
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning fluid&mdash;4 cans @ .35
</cell>
<cell>
1.40
</cell>
<cell>
Shoe brush&mdash;&frac14; @ .50
</cell>
<cell>
.25
</cell>
<cell>
Shoe polish&mdash;6 tins @ .10
</cell>
<cell>
.60
</cell>
<cell>
Shoe cleaner&mdash;1 bottle @ .50
</cell>
<cell>
.50
</cell>
<cell>
Miscellaneous bathroom supplies
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Stationery and postage
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$991.98
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<p>appear in table 9.  With regard to the laundry, it is assumed that bed lines and the husband&apos;s shirts and collars are given out, and that the allowance of $1.50 a week pays for laundry work of this type.  Assuming that members of the family will give the garden the ordinary care, a gardener is allowed for only twice a year.  Also, since the absence of resident help leaves the children alone in case the parents desire to go out in the evening, a further sum is allowed to pay for someone to come in once a week and stay with the children when the parents are away.  These specifications increase the total bill for services to $300 a year.  A resident servant, even one poorly trained, would swell this expenditure for help to at least $900.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Replacement and renovation of furniture and furnishings
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
The cost next largest to domestic service is the replacement and renovation of furniture and furnishings.  The sum of $250 given here represents the cost of keeping up what has been bought and of replacing what is wearing out.  This cost has been arrived at in the following way:  a sum representing the investment in furnishings was first fixed upon.  Five thousand dollars was believed to be a conservative estimate for the initial outlay.  Three thousand five hundred dollars of this will be spent for furniture, a sum that obviously permits no lavishness.  However, there is a wide range of choice in furniture, and with shopping ability $3,500 gives a good equipment, such as a davenport, an upright piano, a phonograph or radio, the customary odd sets pieces for the living room, dining room, and bedrooms.  Kitchen equipment is more standardized, and the $290 here assigned <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680029">029</controlpgno><printpgno>150</printpgno></pageinfo>seems to be the average amount which allows for a gas range and the other usual kitchen appliances.  The costs given here for electrical equipment include a vacuum cleaner, an electric iron, a percolater, a toaster, a waffle iron, and a sewing machine.  A washing machine would require additional investment, but is not considered necessary here because there are no small children.  It is assumed that there will be a full set of flat silver which will last a lifetime.  The initial cost of $325 will possibly not appear as a charge but only as a value because the silver is so frequently a gift.
</p>
<table entity="lg680029.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE 10
<lb>
Initial Cost of Furnishing a House with the Annual Costs of
<lb>
Replacements
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Annual replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Initial cost
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated life, years
</cell>
<cell>
Per cent
</cell>
<cell>
Cost
</cell>
<cell>
Furniture
</cell>
<cell>
$3,500
</cell>
<cell>
25
</cell>
<cell>
4
</cell>
<cell>
$140.00
</cell>
<cell>
Kitchen furniture
</cell>
<cell>
210
</cell>
<cell>
20
</cell>
<cell>
5
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Kitchen utensils
</cell>
<cell>
80
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
12&half;
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Electrical equipment
</cell>
<cell>
290
</cell>
<cell>
14
</cell>
<cell>
7
</cell>
<cell>
20.00
</cell>
<cell>
Linens and bedding
</cell>
<cell>
400
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
12&half;
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
China
</cell>
<cell>
175
</cell>
<cell>
10
</cell>
<cell>
10
</cell>
<cell>
17.50
</cell>
<cell>
Cleaning and Laundry equipment
</cell>
<cell>
20
</cell>
<cell>
8
</cell>
<cell>
12&half;
</cell>
<cell>
2.50
</cell>
<cell>
Silver
</cell>
<cell>
325
</cell>
<cell>
lifetime
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$5000
</cell>
<cell>
20
</cell>
<cell>
5
</cell>
<cell>
$250.00
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<p>
The renewal allowance outlined is believed to express the minimum habitually spent to cover annual wear and tear.  Where this amount is not spent, the household cannot possibly escape the shabbiness that arises from the inevitable and more or less rapid deterioration in all classes of household goods.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Light, heat, and fuel
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
The charges under this subheading appearing in table 9 derive from the general assumption that the modern house, which the family has chosen, will have electric lighting, a gas range for cooking, and a gas water heater.  There will be some central heating, either gas, electricity, or coal, and the costs here set down assume that such central heating plant will be used for an average of about two months in a year.  The fireplace will be used at least ten months a year.  Information seemed to warrant estimating 54 kilowatt hours of electricity and 6300 cubic feet of gas per month.  The central heating has <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680030">030</controlpgno><printpgno>151</printpgno></pageinfo>been computed on the basis of a coal furnace, as probably more common than gas or electricity.  The assignment of three tons of coal and one and one-half cords of logs for the fireplace is certainly not an overestimate.  The total cost of $209 per annum probably represents a minimum annual sum for heating, light, and fuel that only the maximum of economy can make sufficient for this class of consumers.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Other items
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Ice, telephone, stationery, garbage removal, the cleaning supplies for household uses and for members of the family&mdash;these relatively small items of house operation have been estimated to require about $150 per annum.  Since the climate of the region under consideration is rarely excessively hot, many families use ice on special occasions only.  Recognizing, however, a growing tendency to use small quantities of ice, the allowance here is set at $28 a year, enough to keep a small ice-chest filled during eight months.  The amount assigned for facial soap will purchase only popular domestic brands.  Such an allowance will permit neither imported soaps nor similar small luxuries.
</p>
</div>
<div>
<head>
MISCELLANEOUS
</head>
<table entity="lg680030.t01">
<caption>
<p>
TABLE II
<lb>
Miscellaneous Items With Annual Costs For Each Item
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Items
</cell>
<cell>
Annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
Savings and life insurance
</cell>
<cell>
$620.00
</cell>
<cell>
Savings
</cell>
<cell>
$360.00
</cell>
<cell>
Life insurance&mdash;$10,000 @ $26.00 per 1,000
</cell>
<cell>
260.00
</cell>
<cell>
Automobile
</cell>
<cell>
382.48
</cell>
<cell>
Upkeep @ $25.00
</cell>
<cell>
300.00
</cell>
<cell>
Insurance
</cell>
<cell>
68.50
</cell>
<cell>
Tax&mdash;$300.00 assessed valuation @ $3.66 per $100.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.98
</cell>
<cell>
License
</cell>
<cell>
3.00
</cell>
<cell>
Medical care
</cell>
<cell>
275.00
</cell>
<cell>
Recreation
<anchor id="n030-01">
*
</anchor>
</cell>
<cell>
219.40
</cell>
<cell>
Commercial amusements
</cell>
<cell>
76.40
</cell>
<cell>
Theater&mdash;6 times a year&mdash;2 persons @ 1.65
</cell>
<cell>
$19.80
</cell>
<cell>
Concerts&mdash;4 times a year&mdash;2 persons @ 2.00
</cell>
<cell>
16.00
</cell>
<cell>
Movies&mdash;once a month, 2 persons @ .50,2 @ .15
</cell>
<cell>
15.60
</cell>
<cell>
Opera&mdash;once a year, 2 persons @ 2.50
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Football&mdash;once a year, 2 persons @ 5.00
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Vacation&mdash;camping or a rented cottage
</cell>
<cell>
125.00
</cell>
<cell>
Records for phonograph or upkeep of radio
</cell>
<cell>
18.00
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680031">031</controlpgno><printpgno>152</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
Education
</cell>
<cell>
136.80
</cell>
<cell>
School supplies, etc
</cell>
<cell>
5.00
</cell>
<cell>
Private lessons&mdash;music
</cell>
<cell>
96.00
</cell>
<cell>
Daily papers&mdash;morning
</cell>
<cell>
13.80
</cell>
<cell>
Periodicals
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Books
</cell>
<cell>
10.00
</cell>
<cell>
Gifts
</cell>
<cell>
125.00
</cell>
<cell>
Social entertainment
<anchor id="n031-01">
*
</anchor>
</cell>
<cell>
123.00
</cell>
<cell>
Dinners&mdash;6 @ $10.00 or 4 @ $15.00
</cell>
<cell>
60.00
</cell>
<cell>
Luncheons&mdash;6 @ 5.00
</cell>
<cell>
30.00
</cell>
<cell>
Bridge parties&mdash;2 @ 12.00
</cell>
<cell>
24.00
</cell>
<cell>
Informal Sunday teas&mdash;6 @ 1.50
</cell>
<cell>
9.00
</cell>
<cell>
Charity
</cell>
<cell>
60.00
</cell>
<cell>
Incidentals @ $5.00 a month
</cell>
<cell>
60.00
</cell>
<cell>
Tobacco
</cell>
<cell>
54.00
</cell>
<cell>
Church
</cell>
<cell>
50.00
</cell>
<cell>
Barber and cosmetics
</cell>
<cell>
46.32
</cell>
<cell>
Barber
</cell>
<cell>
34.95
</cell>
<cell>
Man&mdash;18 haircuts @.65
</cell>
<cell>
11.70
</cell>
<cell>
Woman&mdash;15 haircuts @.75
</cell>
<cell>
11.25
</cell>
<cell>
Children&mdash;12 haircuts each @.50
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Cosmetics
</cell>
<cell>
6.50
</cell>
<cell>
Cleansing cream&mdash;2 jars @1.00
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
Face powder&mdash;1 box @1.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.50
</cell>
<cell>
Talcum&mdash;2 cans @.50
</cell>
<cell>
1.00
</cell>
<cell>
Compacts&mdash;1 @1.50, 1 refill @.50
</cell>
<cell>
2.00
</cell>
<cell>
Shaving upkeep
</cell>
<cell>
4.87
</cell>
<cell>
Shaving cream&mdash;6 tubes @.49
</cell>
<cell>
2.94
</cell>
<cell>
Razor blades&mdash;2 pkg. @.77,1 pkg. @.39
</cell>
<cell>
1.93
</cell>
<cell>
Carfare
</cell>
<cell>
40.00
</cell>
<cell>
Organization dues
</cell>
<cell>
36.00
</cell>
<cell>
Husband&mdash;2
</cell>
<cell>
24.00
</cell>
<cell>
Wife&mdash;2
</cell>
<cell>
12.00
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
$2228.00
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<note anchor.ids="n030-01" place="bottom">
* These details are inserted merely as an index of one of the possible ways of spending this allotment.
</note>
<note anchor.ids="n031-01" place="bottom">
* These details are inserted merely as an index of one of the possible ways of spending this allotment.
</note>
<p>
Under this somewhat negligent title, a group of items appears whose number and importance increase for all classes of consumers.  The items listed in table II gauge the family standard of living and especially the decisions about acquiring the &ldquo;new known goods&rdquo; that appeal for the alert purchasers&rsquo; attention.  Items such as social entertainment and recreation, the automobile, preventive care of health, education, savings&mdash;all these classes of expenditure represent both a widening theory of &ldquo;necessaries&rdquo; and a field where choice may be <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680032">032</controlpgno><printpgno>153</printpgno></pageinfo>most freely exercised.  This is the division of expenditure about which Engel said that expenditures increase as income rises.
</p>
<p>
Observation and inquiry lead the committee to believe that, given current habits of spending at a professional standard, at least $2,228, or 34.3 per cent of the total budget, is typically absorbed by this class of wants.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Insurance and savings
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
The sums allotted to these two items result from assuming that because the family is making somewhat large payments on their dwelling, the amount which may be assigned to other forms of savings will at this period of their lives be naturally reduced.  The payments recorded for life insurance are calculated on the general assumption that a man of this age and with this earning power will probably undertake to carry an insurance policy that amounts to about twice his annual income.  Thus the premiums here entered represent payments on a $10,000 policy for the man with average health.  Thirty dollars a month is allowed for other savings.  Obviously this is a small sum, and can scarcely be considered a source of income.  Rather it is a bank saving to meet emergencies or to pay for the periodical purchase of a new car.  Much larger sacrifices in other directions will be necessary and are undoubtedly often made on an income of this size if the family believes in setting up a larger reserve fund.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Automobile
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Present custom in California dictates including an automobile in the belongings of a family of this class.  The type of car here assigned is one of the popular makes costing around $1,000.  Probably this is a conservative amount.  One thousand eight hundred dollars is much more likely to be the cost price of the automobile, in which case, the upkeep as estimated here is low.  The allowance entered in table 11 is, of course, for the annual cost of running the car.  The total of $382.48, nearly six per cent of the total annual expenditure, which represents the reported average expenditure, allows $25 monthly to run the car, and $68.50 for insurance.  Membership in an automobile club, the heavier costs of wear and tear, and depreciation are not allowed for.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Carfare
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Carfare appears as an annual expenditure of $40.  The carfare in San Francisco is still five cents.  Six round trips a week, fifty weeks <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680033">033</controlpgno><printpgno>154</printpgno></pageinfo>in the year, for the husband, and two round trips a week for the rest of the family is probably a low estimate.  The automobile naturally reduces this cost.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Medical care
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Obviously the costs of the medical care of a family during my given year cannot be foreseen.  Certain considerations, however, help to make it possible to state an approximate amount.  A new standard of preventive care of the teeth has introduced the element of routine dentistry charges.  The new dental routine means at least a semi-annual visit to the dentist for each member of the family.  The costs of an increasingly watchful care of the eyesight; tonsillotomy for the children; the unavoidable minor ailments or an annual attack of the &ldquo;flu&rdquo; with the costs of the drugs that follow the doctor&apos;s visit&mdash;these events will total a sum not less, on an average, than $250 or $275 per annum.  Such an amount may not be spent in a given year, but good years and bad years taken together, the average charge upon income for meeting prophylactic care and departures from general health will probably not be much less than the sum designated.  It is taken for granted that the average family cannot provide out of current annual income against the cost of serious illness.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Recreation and social entertainment
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Students of human needs agree that recreation is a &ldquo;necessity&rdquo; for satisfactory living.  Accepting this dictum as a truism, and accepting the further fact that there is every evidence of an increasing will to spend for leisure-time pursuits, the committee has assigned five per cent of the total income as the probable minimum costs if the family adopts the current notions of ways to spend money during leisure time.  Hospitality has been assumed to be both a satisfaction and a social necessity for the class under consideration.  The small sum set aside for the purposes of social entertainment&mdash;$123 a year&mdash;forbids any large or elaborate plan of hospitality.  Such an amount allows two &ldquo;parties&rdquo; of one type or another annually, and some formal dinners or luncheons.  If the latter are simple, they may occur monthly; if more pretentious, these occasions will come less frequently.  It will be remembered that the costs of casual guests are provided for in the regular food allowance.  Small as it is, $123 a year permits certain variations, according to taste, in the use of this amount.  The allowance of $76.40 for amusements that have a price is based upon a theory that the class of spender herein considered <pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680034">034</controlpgno><printpgno>155</printpgno></pageinfo>is influenced by a compromise between what custom dictates and a reasoned plan.  The whole family goes to the movies once or twice a month; less often the parents go to a concert, a theater, or an opera.  The total allotment for this class of recreation includes $10, which will permit relations with such social activities as church socials, special club meetings, excursions, and the like.  Annual attendance at the football games is assumed to be habitual.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Vacation
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Report on prevailing ways of living in this class warrants the assumption that the family takes some vacation.  The sum of $125 here apportioned is recognized as the minimum vacation costs for a family of four.  Carefully spent, such an amount will permit the family to go for a brief period to a summer hotel.  If a longer period is preferred, the allotment will be spent for some form of automobile camping or renting a cottage at the seaside or in the mountains.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Phonograph records
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
In recognition of an almost universal custom, allotment appears for the periodic purchase of phonograph records or radio accessories.  Eighteen dollars is probably a minimum sum for this type of education or recreation.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Tobacco
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Throughout this estimate, the aim of the committee has been to picture a class of spenders whose ways are conservative.  The amount assigned for tobacco can only be justified with this reservation in mind.  Fifty-four dollars a year, or $4.50 a month, is assumed the necessary expenditure for one who does not smoke heavily, who smokes cigarettes as often as cigars, and who indulges neither his friends nor himself in imported varieties of the weed.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Organizations and clubs
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
The family of the type under consideration can belong neither to country clubs nor to exclusive city clubs.  If golf is played at all, it must be on public courses.  The allowances of $12 for the wife&apos;s social affiliations will permit her to belong to a church society, an informal card club, or some civic or social organization.  Unless she makes deductions from some other field of expenditure, she cannot belong even to the less expensive &ldquo;exclusive&rdquo; clubs.  Likewise, should the husband join a service club or other professional organization, the $24 assigned him would be, of course, insufficient.
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680035">035</controlpgno><printpgno>156</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Church and charity
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
There seems to be no consensus of opinion about the amounts spent for church and charity.  Certain families have no church affiliations; others make a point of giving generous support.  As social influences now run in the locality whose way spending is being shown, it would appear that the typical professional family gives to church and charity in about the proportions allotted here.  Given the public pressure to contribute one per cent of its income that the annual Community Chest Drive represents, about $60 a year will go to charity.  It is also believed that as a class, this group will more or less voluntarily expend $50 a year for church or some type of kindred affiliation.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Education
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Our information seems to dictate setting aside an annual change of $136.80 or education.  The amount permits no fees for private schools.  The children may have some lessons in dancing or music, but the teachers employed cannot be paid at the highest prices.  The customs we have examined suggest that the remainder of the education costs will go to one or two daily papers, an uncertain number of periodicals, and a very few books.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Gifts
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Like church and charity, the item of gifts rests on small information and differing opinion.  The sum of $125 appearing here may be too little or too much.  It would seem, however, that if the family is to meet the well-established tradition of Christmas giving within its own group, and pay besides for the occasional wedding gift, for certain Christmas exchanges, and contribute to an occasional occupational or social offering, $125 is the minimum annual expenditure to meet such claims.
</p>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Barber and cosmetics
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Barber shop and accessories to the toilet add to the rising costs in the current standard of living among all classes of consumers.  Forty-six dollars has been assigned as the probable annual costs for this class of service&mdash;but not without the exercise of self-restraint.  However, with $46 a year, the husband may go to his barber once in three weeks, the wife may bob her hair, and the children may have occasional haircuts.
</p>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680036">036</controlpgno><printpgno>157</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>
<hi rend="italics">
Incidentals
</hi>
&mdash;
</p>
<p>
Any estimate must recognize incalculable extras.  The $5 a month, or $60 a year, added here is an arbitrary allowance for the unforeseen.  A funeral, a law-suit, moving, or any other unusual event which would involve relatively high costs, is not accounted for at all in this estimate of incidentals.
</p>
</div>
</body>
<back>
<div>
<head>
APPENDIX
<lb>
Sample Pages of Schedule
</head>
<table entity="lg680036.t01">
<caption>
<p>
CLOTHING FOR HUSBAND
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
&ldquo;Ceremonial&rdquo; clothing or clothing for &ldquo;occasions&rdquo;
</cell>
<cell>
Custom price
</cell>
<cell>
Total stock on hand
</cell>
<cell>
Annual replacement
</cell>
<cell>
Formal:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats
</cell>
<cell>
Overcoat
</cell>
<cell>
Suits:
</cell>
<cell>
Full dress
</cell>
<cell>
Tuxedo
</cell>
<cell>
Frock coat and striped trousers
</cell>
<cell>
Shoes
</cell>
<cell>
Socks (silk)
</cell>
<cell>
Shirts:
</cell>
<cell>
Pleated bosom
</cell>
<cell>
Stiff bosom
</cell>
<cell>
Collars
</cell>
<cell>
Ties
</cell>
<cell>
Black bow
</cell>
<cell>
White bow
</cell>
<cell>
Suspenders
</cell>
<cell>
Gloves
</cell>
<cell>
Muffler
</cell>
<cell>
Jewelry
<anchor id="n036-01">
*
</anchor>
</cell>
<cell>
Business clothing:
</cell>
<cell>
Hats:
</cell>
<cell>
Felt
</cell>
<cell>
Straw
</cell>
 
</tabletext>
</table>
<note anchor.ids="n036-01" place="bottom">
* Should not be indicated here unless there is some recurrent expenditure for it, since most jewelry is acquired through gifts.
</note>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680037">037</controlpgno><printpgno>158</printpgno></pageinfo>
<table entity="lg680037.t01">
<caption>
<p>
KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
Custom price
</cell>
<cell>
Description
</cell>
<cell>
Number
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated life&mdash;yrs.
</cell>
<cell>
A.  Furniture
</cell>
<cell>
Table:
</cell>
<cell>
Work
</cell>
<cell>
Breakfast
</cell>
<cell>
Chairs&mdash;straight
</cell>
<cell>
White
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Stool
</cell>
<cell>
White
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Linoleum
</cell>
<cell>
Inlaid
</cell>
<cell>
Refrigerator or ice box
</cell>
<cell>
Leonard
</cell>
<cell>
Stove:
<anchor id="n037-01">
*
</anchor>
</cell>
<cell>
Gas
</cell>
<cell>
Coal
</cell>
<cell>
Combination gas and coal
</cell>
<cell>
Fireless cooker
</cell>
<cell>
Kitchen cabinet
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
B.  Utensils
</cell>
<cell>
a.  Preparation of food for cooking:
</cell>
<cell>
Apple corer
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Bread mixer
</cell>
<cell>
Bread:
</cell>
<cell>
Bread
</cell>
<cell>
Meat
</cell>
<cell>
Chopping bowl
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Cutters:
</cell>
<cell>
Biscuit:
</cell>
<cell>
Large
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Small
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Cookie:
</cell>
<cell>
Set fancy shapes
</cell>
<cell>
1
</cell>
<cell>
Doughnut
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
<note anchor.ids="n037-01" place="bottom">
* See Electrical list for electric stove.
</note>
<table entity="lg680037.t02">
<caption>
<p>
MISCELLANEOUS
</p>
</caption>
<tabletext>
<cell>
1.  Social entertainment
</cell>
<cell>
Number per year
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated expenditure
</cell>
<cell>
At home:
</cell>
<cell>
Dinner parties
</cell>
<cell>
Luncheons
</cell>
<cell>
Bridge parties
</cell>
<cell>
Formal teas
</cell>
<cell>
Informal Sunday teas
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
At club or hotel:
</cell>
<cell>
Dinner parties
</cell>
<cell>
Luncheons
</cell>
<cell>
Bridge parties
</cell>
<cell>
Formal teas
</cell>
<cell>
Theater parties
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680038">038</controlpgno><printpgno>159</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
2.  Recreation other than entertaining:
</cell>
<cell>
Theater
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Concert
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Movie
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Opera
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Athletic games:
</cell>
<cell>
Football
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Baseball
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Lectures
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
Other&mdash;specify
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family going
</cell>
<cell>
Times per year
</cell>
<cell>
3.  Tobacco:
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated cost per month
</cell>
<cell>
Number of family using
</cell>
<cell>
4.  Club dues:
</cell>
<cell>
Both members of family:
</cell>
<cell>
Country club
</cell>
<cell>
Other (specify)
</cell>
<cell>
Husband:
</cell>
<cell>
Social clubs
</cell>
<cell>
Civic clubs
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
Wife:
</cell>
<cell>
Social
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
5.  Automobile:
</cell>
<cell>
Average price paid for car
</cell>
<cell>
$
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated monthly upkeep
</cell>
<cell>
Taxi:
</cell>
<cell>
Number of times used per month
</cell>
<cell>
or per year
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated cost per year
</cell>
<cell>
Number
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated annual cost
</cell>
<cell>
6.  Vacation and travel:
</cell>
<cell>
Number of weeks per year
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated cost
</cell>
<cell>
Types of vacation:
</cell>
<cell>
Camping
</cell>
<cell>
Travel
</cell>
<cell>
Residence in summer resort:
</cell>
<cell>
Owned home
</cell>
<cell>
Rented home
</cell>
<cell>
Hotel
</cell>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680039">039</controlpgno><printpgno>160</printpgno></pageinfo>
<cell>
7.  Education:
</cell>
<cell>
Estimated annual expenditure
</cell>
<cell>
School expenses:
</cell>
<cell>
Tuition
</cell>
<cell>
Books
</cell>
<cell>
Supplies
</cell>
<cell>
Private lessons:
</cell>
<cell>
Adults
</cell>
<cell>
Children
</cell>
<cell>
Total
</cell>
<cell>
Dancing
</cell>
<cell>
Music
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
Periodicals
</cell>
<cell>
Daily papers
</cell>
<cell>
Books
</cell>
<cell>
8.  Investment and savings:
</cell>
<cell>
Real estate
</cell>
<cell>
Stocks and bonds
</cell>
<cell>
Life insurance
</cell>
<cell>
Accident insurance
</cell>
<cell>
Savings
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
9.  Church:
</cell>
<cell>
Regular contributions
</cell>
<cell>
Special
</cell>
<cell>
10.  Charity:
</cell>
<cell>
General support of charities
</cell>
<cell>
Personal charity
</cell>
<cell>
Dependents outside the house:
</cell>
<cell>
Regular allowance
</cell>
<cell>
Occasional allowance
</cell>
<cell>
11.  Health:
</cell>
<cell>
Fees for physician
</cell>
<cell>
Fees for dentist
</cell>
<cell>
Fees for other specialists
</cell>
<cell>
Drugs on prescription
</cell>
<cell>
Drugs for hygienic purposes
</cell>
<cell>
Eyeglasses
</cell>
<cell>
Hospital expenses
</cell>
<cell>
Nursing
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
<cell>
12.  Gifts:
</cell>
<cell>
Christmas
</cell>
<cell>
Birthday
</cell>
<cell>
Wedding
</cell>
<cell>
Sick friends
</cell>
<cell>
Other
</cell>
</tabletext>
</table>
</div>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680040">040</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>
EDUCATION
<lb>
William J. Kemp, Leon J. Richardson, and G. F. Ruch, Editors.
<lb>
Vols. I ($3.50), III ($3.50), IV ($2.50), and V ($4.00) completed.
<lb>
Vol. II in progress.
<lb>
Cited as Univ. Calif. Publ. Educ.
</head>
<ad>
<list>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  1
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Notes on the Development of a Child, by Milicent Washburn Shinn.  424 pages.  1893-1899.  Reprinted in part, March, 1909
<hsep>
(
<hi rend="italics">
Out of print.
</hi>
)
</p>
<p>
Originally issued as 
<hi rend="italics">
University of California Studies,
</hi>
 Volume I.  Pages 1-178 have been reprinted from the original plates, and a title page and table of contents added.  The original edition is now exhausted, and also the reprint edition.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  2
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  Notes on Children&apos;s Drawings, edited by Elmer Ellsworth Brown
<hsep>
.75
</p>
<p>
(Published as 
<hi rend="italics">
University of California Studies,
</hi>
 Volume II, No. 1, 1897.)
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  3
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  The Original of American State Universities, by Elmer Ellsworth Brown.  April, 1903.
<hsep>
.50
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  State Aid to Secondary Schools, by David Rhys Jones.  December, 1903.
<hsep>
.75
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  Inherited Tendencies of Secondary Instruction in the United States, by Herbert Galen Lull.  April, 1913.
<hsep>
1.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
4.  The Growth of Responsibility and Enlargement of Power of the City School Superintendent, by Arthur Henry Chamberlain.  May, 1913.
<hsep>
1.75
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Index is out of print.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  4
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Notes on the Development of a Child.  II.  The Development of the Senses in the First Three Years of Childhood, by Milicent Washburn Shinn.  258 pages.  July, 1908
<hsep>
2.50
</p>
<p>
The index in this volume covers the material in both parts of the 
<hi rend="italics">
Notes on the Development of a Child,
</hi>
 i.e., of volumes 1 and 4 of this series.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  5
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
1.  Superstition and Education, by Fletcher Bascom Dresslar.  July, 1907
<hsep>
2.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
2.  The Demonstration Play School of 1913, by Clark W. Hetherington.  July, 1914.
<hsep>
.45
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
3.  The American State Reformatory with Special Reference to its Educational Aspects, by Frank Fielding Nalder.  March, 1920
<hsep>
1.80
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Index, pp. 469-471.
</p>
</item>
</list>
</ad></div>
<div>
<head>
PHILOSOPHY
<lb>
George P. Adams, J. Lowenberg, and Stephen C. Pepper, Editors
<lb>
Cited as Univ. Calif. Publ. Philos.
</head>
<ad><list type="ordered">
<item>
<p>
Volume I, 262 pages, 1904
<hsep>
$2.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Volume II, 290 pages, 1909-1921
<hsep>
2.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  III
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Rieber.  Footnotes to Formal Logic
<hsep>
Cloth, $2.00; paper, 1.50
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Prall.  A Study in the Theory of Value
<hsep>
1.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  IV
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Issues and Tendencies in Contemporary Philosophy.  Lectures delivered before the Philosophical Union, University of California, 1922-23.
<hsep>
(
<hi rend="italics">
Out of print
</hi>
.)
</p>
</item>
<pageinfo><controlpgno entity="lg680041">041</controlpgno><printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  V
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Essays in Metaphysics.  lectures delivered before the Philosophical union, University of California, 1923-24
<hsep>
(
<hi rend="italics">
Out of print.
</hi>
)
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  VI
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Dennes.  The Method and Presuppositions of Group Psychology
<hsep>
(
<hi rend="italics">
Out of print.
</hi>
)
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Perry.  A Modernist View of National Ideals
<hsep>
.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Lewis.  The pragmatic Element in Knowledge
<hsep>
.35
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
McGilvary.  Times, New and Old
<hsep>
.45
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  VII
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Studies in the Problem of Norms.  Lectures delivered before the Philosophical Union, University of California, 1924-25
<hsep>
$3.00
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Adams.  Norms and Reason.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Lenzen.  Regulative Principles in Physical Science.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Prall.  Naturalism and Norms.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Pepper.  Standard Value.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Parker.  The Harmony Principle in Ethics.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Loewenberg.  Is Metaphysics Descriptive or Normative?
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Montague.  Time and the Fourth Dimension.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  VIII
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Studies in the Nature of Ideas.  Lectures delivered before the Philosophical Union, University of California, 1925-26
<hsep>
$2.75
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Muirhed.  The Real and the Ideal.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Adams.  Ideas in Knowing and Willing.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Pepper.  Transcendence.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Paton.  The idea of the Self.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Loewenberg.  The Metaphysical Status of Things and Ideas.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Prall.  Abstract Ideas.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Lenzen.  Scientific Ideas and Experience.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Murphy.  Ideas and Nature.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  IX
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
The Problem of Substance.  Lectures delivered before the Philosophical Union of the University of California, 1926-27
<hsep>
$2.50
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Loewenberg.  Substance and Subject.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Prall.  The Local Substance.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Murphy.  Substance and Substantive.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Pepper.  The Fiction of Attribution.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Dennes.  Primary Substance.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Lenzen.  Physical Substance.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Muirhead.  Self and Substance.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Vol.  X
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
The Problem of Truth.  Lectures delivered before the Philosophical Union of the University of California, 1927-28
<hsep>
$3.25
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Muirhead.  The Problem of Truth and Some Principles in Aid of Its Solution.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Pepper.  Truth by Continuity.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Lenzen.  Statistical Truth in Physical Science.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Mackay.  Esthetic and Experimental Truth.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Dennes.  Practice as the Test of Truth.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Marhenke.  The Problem of Error.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Loewenberg.  The Fourfold Root of Truth.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Adams.  Truth, Discourse, and Reality.
</p>
</item>
<item>
<p>
Montague.  Truth Subsistential and Existential.
</p>
</item>
</list>
</ad>
</div>
</back>
</text></tei2>
