%images; ]> scsm-001565 Order for Subpoena in Toney v. Sconce, [Law papers]. ...: a machine readable transcription. STERN COLLECTION OF LINCOLNIANA, Library of Congress Selected and converted. American Memory, Library of Congress.

Washington, DC, 2006.

Preceding element provides place and date of transcription only.

For more information about this text and this American Memory collection, refer to accompanying matter.

 Rare Book & Special Collections Division, Library of Congress. Public Domain

The National Digital Library Program at the Library of Congress makes digitized historical materials available for education and scholarship.

This transcription is intended to have an accuracy rate of 99.95 percent or greater and is not intended to reproduce the appearance of the original work. The accompanying images provide a facsimile of this work and represent the appearance of the original.

 2008/11/12
0001

William M Lamm 3rd Replication vs } William Bachop And the said plaintiffs as to the second plea of the said Deft, by him in this behalf pleads by leave of the court for this purpose first obtained, says. Deft p? because he says that there was a memorandum made in writing signed by persons there unto authorised by the said defendant of the said sale of interest in the land therewith referred to and this the plaintiff is ready to testify, wherefore he prays judgment be Murphy

4th And the said Plff as to the plea of the said Deft by him above pleaded, by leave of the court here, first obtained further says deft (preacher?) because he says that as to the said sale & promised no land plea mentions there was a memorandum thereof made in writing & signed by persons thereunto authorised by the said deft, and this the said plff is ready to verify wherefore he prays judgment. Murphy Pro Plf.

0002

Lamm vs Bachop Special Replication

Filed Oct 29, 1853 S G Craig Clk