^~WETOTI> A POLITICAL EQUALITY ULVBIX GENEVA. Several Beasons"m"venl)y Anne Fitz-hngli Miller at the Organ-jzation Meeting1 The following is the address delivered at th! Y M 0 A., on Tuesday evening, Nov 30,'by Miss Anne F. Miller: Gen-£en and Gentlewomen! I wanted to saT'Swcitizens-Mbut all of us are not yet citizens Really speakmg-Weareheretobrfak ground foi' the Coming Club. During the recent convention we were often asked Have you Ipolitical Equality Cub m Geneva? Some of us were sorry to say "no" and made haste to add, "But we hope to have one soon " And now while the inspiration of those noble women, those prophets, those torchbearers, is with us, it is time to be up and doing. Your presence is evidence that we are already up;—of the doing, I should like to say a few words. It may be that some of us are still asking: "Why should we have this club? Of what use will it be?" Let me tell you briefly, why I, for one, want a Political Equality Club in Geneva, and of what use I think it will be. There are two chief reasons why, to my mind, we should have this club:1 The first is the fact, that there are very many people in our town who believe in the principle of Political Equality and who will be glad of this chance to hasten or to help to hasten, its realization. The Club will give us an opportunity to work for the cause in which we believe. ¦ The second reason, which seems to me of equal importance, is not based on any consideration of good to the cause. It is for our ohm good, I want this Club. I have the strongest faith in the benefit that we, as individuals, shall derive from such an organization as I trust this is to be. Our need of a more intelligent understanding of public affairs and a keener sense of responsibility in regard to them, is apparent.—I know that an undefined but real sentiment of horror ex-Hsts in the minds of many, when anything public is suggested. Especially tre all gentlewomen supposed to shrink xom anything of a public nature -. As jln illustration of this feeling I have in /nind some remarks of Horace Greeley's son-in-law, Col. Nicholas Smith, himself a semi-public character. To fully appreciate what the Colonel said, one must know something of him. He was a southerner who possessed an ambition to marry Horace Greeley's daughter, whom he had never seen. He came north, he saw, he conquered, and subsequently claimed and gained public recognition- on two grounds. First—He was Ida Greeley's husband. Second—He was a great beauty. The public honored both these claims, and recognized Col. Nicholas Smith when it saw him; even turned its head to look after him as he promenaded Fifth Ave. It was my fate to know the Colonel.and on one oc-1 casionhe said to me in entire seriousness: |'A woman's name should never appear in public print but once during her lifetime, the permissible Exception being in the announcement of her marriage, when a new name is conferred upon her A married woman's name should never appear in any notice save that of her death!" But this is digression. I only wanted to show ho-vy some people feel about anything public, and how those who seem most anxious to shelter others from publicity, ¦will often seek ^i^vu^^^hr^0 me, the almost as respeptabll as Republic-l'm sure it's anearl-elation-and we are all proud enough to be clriiareh. of the Republic. It is our fondness for and faith in the Republic, that has brought us' 'to- ¦ gether to-night, and I'trnst it will keep us together in this club until we walk together to the ballot box, there to dew our respeots to a teener Republic I was recently asked by a lady: " Would you give the ballot to all women?"—I woul.d give the ballot to no woman on the sole ground i that she is a woman--- I would give the ballot to no "manon the so/e~groun