PREVIOUS NEXT ITEM LISTNEW SEARCH

A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774-1875


Item 384 of 1380
Journals of the Continental Congress --THURSDAY APRIL 17.
Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789 PREVIOUS SECTION .. NEXT SECTION .. NAVIGATOR

Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789
THURSDAY APRIL 17.

Link to date-related documents.

Mr. Madison with the permission of the Come. on Revenue reported the following clause to be added to the 10 paragraph in the first report viz


Page 961 | Page image

"And to the end that convenient provision may be made for determining in all such cases how far the expences may have been reasonable as well with respect to the object thereof as to the means for accomplishing it, thirteen co?is?rs. namely one out of each State shall be appointed by Congress, any seven of whom (having first taken an oath for the faithful and impartial execution of their trust) who shall concur in the same opinion, shall be empowered to determine finally on the reasonableness of all claims for expences incurred by particular States as aforesaid; and in order that such determinations may be expedited as much as possible, the Co?is?rs. now in appointment for adjusting accts. between the U. S. and individual States, shall be instructed to examine all such claims & report to Congs. such of them as shall be supported by satisfactory proofs, distinguishing in their reports the objects and measures in which the expences shall have been incurred; provided that no balances which may be found due under this regulation, or the Resolutions of the--day of--, shall be deducted out of the preceding Revenues; but shall be discharged by separate requisitions to be made on the States for that purpose."

In support of this proposition it was argued that in a general provision for public debts and public tranquillity satisfactory measures ought to be taken on a point wch. many of the States had so much at heart, & which they wd. not separate from the other matters proposed by Congress: that the nature of the business was unfit for the decision of Congs., who brought with them the spirit of advocates rather than of Judges, and besides required more time than could be spared for it.

On the opposite side some contended that the Accts. between U. S. & particular States sd. not be made in any manner to encumber those between the former and private persons. Others thought that Congs. could not delegate to Comrs. a power of allowing claims for which the Confedon. reqd. nine States. Others were unwilling to open so wide a door for claims on the Common Treasury.

On the question, Masts. divided. Cont. ay. R. Id. no. N. Y. no. N. J. no. Pa. no. Maryd. no. Va. ay. N.C. no. S.C. no.

PREVIOUS SECTION .. NEXT SECTION .. NAVIGATOR


PREVIOUS NEXT ITEM LISTNEW SEARCH