PREVIOUS NEXT NEW SEARCH

A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774-1875

Journals of the Continental Congress --WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 1779


Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789 PREVIOUS SECTION .. NEXT SECTION .. NAVIGATOR

Journals of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789
WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 1779

Link to date-related documents.

Mr. Tench Francis was nominated for the office of cloathier general by Mr. Shippen.

A letter and memorial from J. Connolly, were read:

Ordered, That they be referred to the committee on a former memorial from him:

That two members be added to the said committee:

The members chosen, Mr. [William] Fleming, and Mr. [Frederick A.] Muhlenberg.

The Committee to whom sundry letters and memorials of John Connolly, now a prisoner in the new Jail of this city, were referred, having examined into the case of the said John Connlly, find that he is possessed of a commission signed by Lord Dunmore, and dated the fifth day of November, 1775, appointing him lieutenant colonel of a regiment called the Queen's rangers; and also a certificate signed H. Brooke, deputy superintendent general of the British forces, acknowledging lieutenant colonel Connolly's appointment, and that he had received his full subsistence to the 25th day of December, 1778;

Whereupon your committee beg leave to submit the following resolutions:


Page 826 | Page image

Resolved, that lieutenant colonel John Connolly, now a prisoner in the new jail of this city, be considered as a prisoner of war, any former resolution of Congress to the contrary notwithstanding.

Resolved, that the said lieutenant colonel Connolly be admitted to his parole, that he forthwith repair to such place, and be confined to such limits as the Board of War shall judge proper.1

[Note 1: 1 This report, in the writing of William Fleming, is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 19, I, folio 589.]

The committee, to whom it was referred to prepare and report a further provision to be made for the officers of the army of the United States, brought in a report, which was read:

Ordered, That Friday next be assigned for taking the same into consideration.

The Board of War, to whom was referred the case of Herman Baron Zedwitz, brought in a report; Whereupon,

Resolved, That Herman Baron Zedwitz, formerly a lieutenant colonel in the service of these states, and who, for certain traiterous practices, was sentenced by a court martial to be confined during the war, be nevertheless, in consideration of his own unhappy condition, after a confinement of near three years, and the consequent distress of his wife and children, permitted to depart these states, together with his family, on giving his parole not to bear arms against the United States or their allies during the war; and that the Marine Committee be directed to provide a passage for them in a continental vessel to the West Indies, and furnish necessaries for the voyage thither, from whence they may return to their friends in Europe.2

[Note 2: 2 This report, dated July 13 (present, Pickering and Peters), is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 147, III, folio 513.]

Congress took into consideration a report of the Committee on the Treasury on the papers from the State and delegates of North Carolina, of the 14, 15, and 26 May last, and 2d of July instant; and thereupon,


Page 827 | Page image

Ordered, That a warrant issue on the treasurer, in favour of the State of North Carolina, for one million dollars, for which the said State is to be accountable.

Mr. Eleazer McComb was nominated by the Board of Treasury to be appointed a commissioner of claims at the Board of Treasury.1

[Note 1: 1 This report, dated July 9, is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 136, III, folio 457. McComb was nominated by William Carmichael.]

A letter, of March 4, from R. Izard, was read.2

[Note 2: 2 This letter is printed in theDiplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution (Wharton), III, 730.]

Mr. [Henry] Laurens, from the committee of the whole House, appointed to confer with the Minister Plenipotentiary of France, reports:

That in obedience to the order of Congress, the committee of the whole have conferred with the Minister Plenipotentiary of France, who introduced the conference by saying, that he had received some despatches from his Court, which he was ordered to communicate to Congress; but that he expected no answer: that, though it was not the usual practice to offer communications of this nature in writing, yet as it had been intimated to him by the President, that this mode would be most agreeable to Congress, he had committed the heads of them to paper, not as a memorial, but merely for the assistance of the memory, in a form to which the term "ad statum legendi" is appropriated by the usage of the courts of Europe: That in reading the said paper, he would take the liberty of making some explanations and reflections.

He then proceeded to read the paper herewith delivered, marked No 1, divided into seven articles; and at the close of each separate article, he added explanations and reflections, the substance of which the committee


Page 828 | Page image

have endeavoured to recollect, and committed to writing in the paper marked No. 2.

contained in the Paper herewith also delivered, marked No. 2, and therein respectively referred to the 7 Articles of the first paper, by the figures, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.

After reading the first paper and making the explanations and reflections contained in the second, he delivered the first Paper into the hands of the chairman.

Your committee then observed to the Minister, that at a former Conference he intimated an Expectation, that the British Court would send over new Commissioners to negotiate with these States and to attempt seducing them into a separate Treaty; and as he had in the present Conference taken no notice of any such Design, desired to know, whether his silence on that subject proceeded from a persuasion in his Court, that the British Court had relinquished that Design. To which, the Minister replied, that his Court, having been silent on that head, he concluded that the new Commissioners would not be sent, but that any Negotiations for a pacification would be carried on under the Mediation of Spain.

The committee then taking notice of what the Minister had said concerning a tacit assurance of the independence of these states, and the reluctance of the king of Great Britain to make an express acknowledgment thereof, requested to know his sense concerning the manner in which such tacit assurance could be given.

To which he, premising that what he should now say ought to be considered only as his private sentiments, replied, That the British Court would probably


Page 829 | Page image

endeavour to avoid an express acknowledgment by imitating precedents that had occurred in Europe on similar occasions, instancing the cases of the Swiss cantons, and of the United Provinces of Holland; that the mode adopted in the latter case had been for the archdukes, to whom the king of Spain had transferred his right of sovereignty, to treat with them "as with free and independent states." And that with respect to the said cantons, France had not been able to obtain more for them in the treaty of Münster than "a declaration that they should be in possession as of full liberty and exemption from the empire, and be, in no manner, subject to the jurisdiction thereof."that it appeared probable to him that a Declaration more full and explicit than this might be obtained for these States [But that, in his opinion, the circumstances of these states, and the manner in which they had conducted their opposition, would justify their expecting a more full declaration.]1

[Note 1: 1 This report, in the writing of John Dickinson, is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 25, I, folio 115. The words in brackets were inserted by Thomson.]

Philadelphia,July 12, 1779.

This substantial alternative in an engagement which is a mere gratuitous gift without any compensation, or stipulation, ought indeed never to be forgotten in a negotiation for peace. France foresaw the extreme difficulties a formal and nominal acknowledgment should meet with. She knew by her own experience in similar contests in which she has been deeply concerned, respecting the republicks of Holland, Genoa, and the Swiss cantons, how tenacious and repugnant monarchs are to pronounce


Page 834 | Page image

the humiliating formula. It was only obtained for Hollandtacitly, after a war of thirty years; and explicitly, after a resistance of seventy. To this day Genoa and the Swiss have obtained no renunciation, nor acknowledgment, either tacit, or formal, from their former sovereigns. But they enjoy their sovereignty and independence only under the guarantee of France. His Court thought it important to avoid, that difficulties of this nature, which reside merely in words, should delay or prevent America from enjoying the thing itself. From these considerations the very important and explicit stipulation in the treaty of alliance, which he related just now, arose, and hath received the sanction of the United States. The circumstances seem already such as call forth the application of this alternative, of tacit or explicit acknowledgment. Therefore all those considerations are delivered, that Congress may, if they think proper, consider if the literal execution of the treaty in this point is not become necessary, and if the safety and the happiness of the American people, as well as the essential principles of the alliance, are not intimately connected with the resolutions which may be taken on this matter. And it remains by the prudence of Congress to examine if instructions upon some particular conditions may not frustrate the salutary purposes of the treaty of alliance relating to a tacit acknowledgment which the situation of affairs may require. In executing thus, the orders he has received, he cannot omit observing, that these orders were given with the full presumption, that the business which he laid before Congress in February last would have been long ago settled when those despatches should come to his hands. However sensibly his Court will be disappointed in her expectations, he shall add nothing to the information and observations which with the warmest zeal for the mutual interest and honour [of both countries,] and by the dutiesof his office and his instructions, he found himself bound to deliver from time to time to Congress, in the course of this business. The apprehension of giving new matter to those who endeavour to inculpate Congress, is a new motive for him to remain silent. He begs only leave to remind this honourable body of the aforesaid information and reflections, and particularly of those which he had the honour to deliver to an assembly similar to the present. He shall only insist on a single point,


Page 835 | Page image

which he established then and since in one of his memorials. It is, the manifest and striking necessity to enable Spain, by the determination of just and moderate terms, to press upon England with her good offices, and to bring her mediation to an issue, in order that we may know if we shall expect either war or peace. This step is looked upon in Europe as immediately necessary. It was the proper object of the message which he delivered in February last. He established then the strong reasons which may require, that at the same time and without delay, proper terms should be offered to his Catholick Majesty, in order to reconcile him perfectly with the American interest. He concealed not, that it was to be feared, that any condition inconsistent with the established system of the alliance, which is the binding and only law of the allies, and contrary to the line of conduct which Spain pursued in the course of her mediation, would lead her to drop the mediation, and prevent his Catholick Majesty, by motives of honour and of faithfulness, from joining in our common cause, and from completing the intended triumvirate. No loss, no unhappy event could be so heavy upon the alliance as this. Indeed although the British forces are already kept in check by the combined efforts of France and America, it is nevertheless evident that the accession of Spain only can give to the alliance a decided superiority adequate to our purposes, and free us from this fatal chance that a single unlucky event may overthrow the balance.1

[Note 1: 1 This minute, in the writing of Henry Laurens, is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 25, I, folio 123. The proceedings are entered only in the manuscript Secret Journal, Foreign Affairs,]

The report and papers therein referred to being read,

Ordered, That the same be taken into consideration on Thursday next.

Motion of Mr. [John] Dickinson, seconded by Mr. [William Henry] Drayton.

Resolved, that a Body ofthousand men be collected from the Militia of the States ofon theDay ofnext, at such places as the Commander in Chief shall think proper.

That as soon as the said Militia shall be in readiness to cooperate with the army, Congress immediately adjourn to the place where the


Page 836 | Page image

Army shall be, and that the members shall respectively join the Militia, and act with them in such important operations as shall be judged most expedient for advancing the welfare of these States.1

[Note 1: 1 This motion, in the writing of John Dickinson, is in thePapers of the Continental Congress, No. 36, I, folio 29. It is endorsed "July 14, 1779."]

Adjourned to 10 oClock to Morrow.

PREVIOUS SECTION .. NEXT SECTION .. NAVIGATOR


PREVIOUS NEXT NEW SEARCH